What is Brahminism now?
From the Bhakti List Archives
• May 11, 1999
srimathE raamaanNujaaya nama: >For example, how many brahmins do you know in this country who perform "aupAsana"? How many do the >Panca-mahA-yajna? How many actively do veda-adhyayana, with correct svara and pronunciation? Zero. Yet all these are >absolutely required of a brahmin and were practiced by many brahmins as recently as a 100 years. And the opinion of the >traditional acharyas was that people who did not perform these rituals were in no way fit to be called brahmins. One need >only look at the 'Ahnika' and 'dinacaryA' texts of our pUrvAcAryas to see what a real brahmin lifestyle was like. So it is >foolhardy to think that people can live in this country, go to work, and still maintan a lifestyle as befits a brahmin. Sriman Mani, After reading your posting on Saturday (v.003.n.365) about modern day brahmins, I get a message that it is very rare to see a brahmin who still maintains rituals like "aupAsana etc.( I also feel that you are upset about this!). I have few doubts to ask. If they are not part of the flow of the discussions , I will be very grateful if you can kindly send me a separate e-mail. Should we not see the relevance of the practices and rituals with respect to the Time Period and the context people lived in the past and the time period we are living in. In those days, when science and technology was not well developed, few rituals and practices were there which are now seen with lot of scientific relevance. They were assigned to the Brahmins( Roles were clearly defined in those days). Scientifically it is known that the smoke out of yagams and yagjams performed in the agni with ghee were catalytic to induce rain; Apasthambam ( part of parisHEshanam ) was done to prevent insects and ants coming on the plates or leaves while eating etc. as in those days the floorings were mostly muddy. So, isn't that the rituals need changes as we progress in time and science. If we are to strictly adhere all these rituals from the "rule book", virtually, as you pointed out, except few, presently , we do not have anyone who would qualify as brahmins strictly. Or, alternatively, is there a scope for redefining the rituals of brahmins? How does one prescribe the rituals and practices for brahmins to follow taking the present time since the roles of brahmins are mixed up? Theoretically, aren't we following the previous so many generations' rituals? The rituals you are mentioning have been in vogue at some point in time taking into account the value system and other factors prevalent at that time. Several years after our generations, are people expected to stick to the same rituals as we are supposed to follow now? Or, Can they be modified now by us to suit the future changes? Or we are not supposed to touch any of those and leave it to the people to redefine as they go(i.e. Cross the bridge when it comes approach). I will be very grateful if scholars like you, Sri Sadagopan and other scholars throw some light on this. I apologise for any wrong choice fo words or any other apacharams. If you find this point does not have any relevance, kindly keep it off the discussion. adiyEn madhurakavi dhAsan T.A.S.Vijayaraghavan Associate Professor XLRI, Jamshedpur,India
- Next message: Madhavakkannan V: "Periya Thirumozhi 3.3- Singavuruvil varuvaan ChithrakoodatthuLLAnE!"
- Previous message: B N SURESH 's ACCOUNT: "stotraratna contd.9 to 12"
- Next in thread: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: What is Brahminism now?"
- Maybe reply: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: What is Brahminism now?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]