Re: Posting 3c) Classification of Reals Contd.
From the Bhakti List Archives
• May 7, 1999
Dear Bhagavatas, Definition 1 ( a more precise statement): A real that under the influence of an external real is subject to change (i.e., a change which is inseparably related to the real), as recognized by the valid means of acquiring knowledge, is denoted a substance. Axiom 2: A non-substance cannot exist independent of a substance. ***Combining definition 1 and axiom 2, we can conclude that a catalyst (the real that brings about the change) must also be a substance. Example 2. A Light bulb is a substance (dravya.) Just like the monitor screen, the light bulb is also subject to change; the change is inseparably related to the light bulb and is initiated by the power button (the power button is a real not within the light bulb.) [I am making use of the refined statement of definition 1 to classify a real as a substance.] Example 3. [ An example where a real undergoes a modification, but the modification is not considered an attribute, since it is not inseparably related to the real.] A pencil is a real. Treat it as an unclassified item, for now. Placing the pencil on a sheet of paper initiates a change, but this modification is not an attribute of the pencil, as it is not inseparably related to it. Note the following: 1. Under the old definition 1, this change would have been sufficient to classify the real as a substance. However, we would have not been able to call the modification an attribute by Definition 3. 2. Now with the refined definition 1 (the correct one) this change would not be sufficient for us to classify the real as a substance. Further, as was the case before, by definition 3 the modification would not qualify as an attribute. This is the correct set of conclusions! 3. Examples were concocted 4. See how thorough our Acharyas were! What a structured, rational, and thorough exposition on the nature of reality. You will see it more and more as we go along. Adiyen
- Next message: Anand Karalapakkam: "Re: Dealing with Darwin?"
- Previous message: Ramanbil_at_aol.com: "Re: Dealing with Darwin?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]