Re: Iyer/Iyengar
From the Bhakti List Archives
• May 6, 1999
Srimathy wrote: > how were our ancestors before the 16th century called? As Sri Bharat pointed out, the term 'Iyengar' predates the 16th century in the name Pillai Perumaal Iyengar. However, it may not have been commonly and uniformly applied to Sri Vaishnavas. One of the older terms for a follower of Ramanuja is "Sri Vaishnava", which first finds mention in Ramanuja's cousin Pillaan's commentary on the Tiruvaymoli. An older word, not applied only to Sri Vaishnavas these days, is "bhAgavata", indicating a follower of the Pancaratra tradition. In the philosophical literature, our tradition is known as Visishtadvaita (after the 13th century) or the rAmAnujIya siddhAnta. You ask an unrelated question: > Who are suyamacharyas? The term is "svayam AchArya purusha". "AchArya purusha" is a learned, tradition person who administers the rite of panca-samskAra (samASrayaNam) to others. "svayam" means "oneself". So, the term "svayam AchArya purusha" means "having an acharya from one's own". svayam-AchArya-purusha is term used for people who do not follow a maTham (Parakala, Ahobila, Vaanamaamalai, Andavan, etc.) and who also do not have an acharya outside their family (mudaliyaandaan, kOyil kandAdai, etc.) This term is used for Sri Vaishnavas who are descendants of the original 74 disciples of Ramanuja, and who continue to have association with learned members of their extended family who administer the panca-samskAra (samASrayaNam) and minister to their needs. Many of our most learned acharyas came from "svayam-AchArya" families -- Desika, Pillai Lokacharya, etc. This is because the concept of a maTha and therefore a sampradAya based on the maTha dates from the 14th century, much after Sri Ramanuja's time. Some notable svayam-AchArya families are Prativaadi Bhayankaram, Tatacharya, Tirumalai Anandaanpillai, Nallaan Chakravarti, etc. There are many scholars among these families even today, as they have a strong sense of connection to the tradition and maintain a certain level of scholarship. Not all descendants of the 74 original disciples are still considered "svayam AchArya". At some point, some of the descendants drifted away from their traditional acharya or did not have a strong scholar in their family, and consequently became associated with some maTham or other swami. So there will be Sri Vaishnavas who bear the appellation "Kidambi", "Vangipuram", "Tatacharya", etc., who at one point belonged to svayam AchArya purusha families, but who now follow some other swami. It should be pointed out that some people object to the term "svayam AchArya purusha" (not the concept behind it) with the feeling that only one person is truly a "svayam AchArya", an acharya for himself -- the Lord. Mani
- Next message: Anand Karalapakkam: "Re: Iyer/Iyengar"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Dealing with Darwin?"
- In reply to: Sugantha Jagannthan: "(no subject)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]