Who is Hri
From the Bhakti List Archives
• May 5, 1999
Sri: Dear Bhaktas, Sriman Sadagopan Swamin encouraged me to share the following observations pertinent to Hri. In his note, Sriman Sadagopan Swamin noted the connection between Hri and Kshama. This Kshama is an all important aspect of the Bhumi Piratti, which manifests itself in her request to the Lord to forgive the sins committed by those seek SharaNagati at His lotus feet. The act of granting SharaNagati is a Yajna performed by the Lord. The role of Bhumi Piratti in this Yajna, is extolled in the Bhu Sooktam Rk "Shrunge Shrunge Yajne Yajne VibhishaNee". In the January 1999 telephone Upanyasam, H.H. Srimad Andavan Swami of Srimad Poundarikapuram Ashramam provided a superb explanation of the role of Bhumi Piratti in granting refuge to a supplicant. H.H. pointed out the analogy of SharaNagati to a court trial-except that in this case, the court is that of Lord Narayana, who is the Supreme Judge. In his imitable style, H.H. Srimad Andavan Swami pointed out that when the Lord turns to one side He sees NeeLa Piratti trying to cover up the sins committed by the supplicant. Angered by this, the Lord turns the other side (hoping to get the support of Bhumi Piratti) only to see Bhumi Piratti requesting forgiveness of the supplicants' sins. The Lord then beholds Sri Devi, who argues that "Although the supplicant has sinned, please overlook his sins and bestow him with grace." In this context, H.H. pointed out the elevated role of Daya (motivated by Kshama) in granting refuge to a Prapanna. H.H. noted that the KalyaNa GuNam of Daya is a female lawyer in the court of Lord Narayana. Lord Narayana is an impartial adjudicator in this court and dispenses justice in strict accordance with the Sastraic injunctions (Pakshapaataana Bhigyam). Various KalyaNa GuNams of the Lord, attest to the Sastraic violations on the part of the supplicant and recommend that the supplicant be punished for his transgressions. H.H. beautifully remarked that the GuNam of Daya, synonymous with JnAna, prevails over all other KalyaNa GuNams, in arguing that the supplicant must not be punished and instead must be graced. H.H. cited PramANams from the RamayaNa in support of Daya Devi's defense. The following arguments are advanced by Daya Devi: "It is known that the supplicant has sinned, and that the Sastras say that he deserves to be punished. However, here is why he should not. Let us take the case of the Ramayana. Sita Piratti, Ilaya Perumal , Hanuman are all KuTravadis (sinners). Why? Did not Sita Piratti hurl abuses at Ilaya Perumal? Did not Ilaya Perumal go to help Lord Rama against the command of the Lord Himself? Did not Hanuman suggest that he would carry Sita (a Parama Pativrata) on his back? Nay the Lord himself can be blamed for placing Sita Piratti in a vulnerable position so that Ravana could kidnap her.Are all of these not in violation of the Sastras? Going by the logic of the other KalyaNa GuNams aren't these acts worthy of punishment? However, are such actions punished? No." Somewhat mollified, the other KalyaNa GuNams recommend that the supplicant perform Prayaschittam. However, Daya Devi debunks this argument as well by stating that "In order to perform Prayaschittam for his violations, the supplicant has to take an infinte number of rebirths and each time he may engage in further Sastraic violations which will only increase his burden. Thererfore, even Prayaschittam is an exercise in futility. Hence, the supplicant should not be punished but instead granted refuge forthwith." The Lord is pleased to hear the arguments of Daya Devi. The other KalyaNa GuNams have no alternative course to offer and concur with Daya Devi's position. The Lord then bestows his grace on the supplicant. Everything correctly stated in entirely due to the grace of my Acharyan, H.H. Srimad Poundarikapuram Andavan Swami. All errors and shortcomings are mine alone. Kamapya Navadhim VandE KaruNa VaruNaalayam Vrishashaila Tatasthanaam Swayam Vyaktim Upagatam Namo Narayana, Muralidhar Rangaswamy _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
- Next message: Jagan Mohan R. Naidu: "RE: Iyer/Iyengar"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Iyer/Iyengar"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]