Re: Raamaayana question
From the Bhakti List Archives
• May 7, 1998
[regarding the mAyA-sIta story] This story does not appear in Srimad Valmiki rAmAyaNam, neither does it appear in the anubhavam of Alvars or Acharyas, nor of the great Tamil poet Kamban. It is generally not accepted in orthodox Sri Vaishnava circles (and among South Indian vaidikas in general), the kUrma purANa notwithstanding. On a purely stylistic note, if there actually had been a mAyA-sIta who was abducted instead of the real Sita piraaTTi, would it not rob the story of a great deal of interest? In fact, the Sri Vaishnava acharyas rely heavily on the "real" Sita's imprisonment in the Asoka Vana in their anubhavam of the story of the Lord. The pain and anguish Rama felt at discovering her loss, the tragedy of the great eagle Jatayu, the consequent struggle Rama underwent at retrieving his beloved, the visit of Hanuman, etc., are all dependent on the real Sita having been abducted by Ravana. Methinks the mAyA-sItA makes the glorious story of Rama as colorless as the mAyA of advaita makes Vedanta. Mani
- Next message: vraghuna_at_CALFED.COM: "The Lord Accepts Imperfect Gifts"
- Previous message: Bharadwaj, Jaganath: "Bhagavad Geeta 1st chapter Parama Saram by Thirukullam Narasimha Raghavachariar"
- Maybe in reply to: Krishna Susarla: "Raamaayana question"
- Next in thread: Krishna Susarla: "Re: Raamaayana question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]