Re: Raamaayana question
From the Bhakti List Archives
• May 6, 1998
>> I was wondering if anyone could confirm the above, that the Maya-Sita is the >> same as Padmaavathi. >Before Raavana takes Maya Sita away, Rama asks her to ask him for a wish. >To that She replies, that its not enough for me to be Maya Sita, I would >like to be Sriman Narayana's wife. To this Rama replies that in this day >and age, he is Eka Patni Vratudu and hence can't marry her. He also tells >her that she will be born to Aakasha Raja and that he will marry her as >Lord Srinivasa and be with her until the end of Kalyuga. Since he has >promised her that Sriman Narayana has to come to earth again. You are >right when you say that Rama wanted to get his Sita back form Agni, and >hence asked the Maya Sita to take Agni Pariksha. If you read Tulsidas >Ramayana, in it he explains that Sita is not wearing the jewelry that was >given to her in Lanka, but she is wearing the very jewelry that Arundati >gave her. Hare Krishna! Thanks for confirming that. Now what I want to know is, is Tulasi-dasa's Raama-charita-manasa the only source of evidence to support the above, or is there scriptural support for it also? While we're on the subject, I am curious to know about Tulasi-das's sampradaaya. I had heard that he was initiated into the Shrii Vaishnava line, but that he may or may not have deviated from that philosophy. I have also heard that his Raama-charita-manasa contains some elements of advaita philosophy, but I have not read it so I was wondering how Shrii Vaishnavas as a whole regard it. yours, -- Krishna Susarla
- Next message: Krishna Susarla: "Re: Dvaita and Visishtadvaita"
- Previous message: Krishna Susarla: "Help: Definitions requested for the following terms"
- Maybe in reply to: Krishna Susarla: "Raamaayana question"
- Next in thread: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Raamaayana question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]