Re: Response to some BHAKTI issues
From the Bhakti List Archives
• May 1, 1997
Mani writes: >Regarding the content of Krishna's article itself, I believe >there are several misconceptions about our pUrvAcAryas' >views of the Alvars as well as the variety of views on the >nature of self-surrender. I believe Krishna's views >are based on a slightly mistaken understanding of Sri >Vedanta Desika's works, as well as a misreading of the >views of Pillai Lokacarya and Manavala MaamunigaL. I will >address these in a longer article in a day or two. > With all due respect to Mr. Kalale, I would have to concur with Mani regarding these misconceptions. However, the issue of Nirhetuka Krpa has been, so far, a relatively ignored subject for this forum, despite it being one of the most important aspects of our Sampradayam. So, such misconceptions are leading to a positive result, a direct discussion of the subtle ideas and unresolved issues that make our philosophy so unique. Let us all pray to Him that such a discussion will not only lead to better understanding of the teachings of our poorvacharyas, but will also increase our devotion to Him. I look forward to learning much from this discussion. Daasanu Daasan, Mohan
- Next message: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Re: Response to some BHAKTI issues"
- Previous message: Krishna Kalale: "Re: Response to some BHAKTI issues"
- Maybe in reply to: Krishna Kalale: "Re: Response to some BHAKTI issues"
- Next in thread: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Re: Response to some BHAKTI issues"
- Reply: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Re: Response to some BHAKTI issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]