Re: Response to some BHAKTI issues
From the Bhakti List Archives
• May 1, 1997
At 11:27 AM 4/30/97 -0700, Mani Varadarajan wrote: >Regarding the content of Krishna's article itself, I believe >there are several misconceptions about our pUrvAcAryas' >views of the Alvars as well as the variety of views on the >nature of self-surrender. I believe Krishna's views >are based on a slightly mistaken understanding of Sri >Vedanta Desika's works, as well as a misreading of the >views of Pillai Lokacarya and Manavala MaamunigaL. I will >address these in a longer article in a day or two. Mani, eventhough I agree that I should not have used capital letters to make my points, I had some reasons to do so. Let me clarify those issues. At the very outset, I wish to apologize to Shri Sundarrajan. I did not mean to offend you at all. I got carried away by the issue of "Effort Vs. Grace", particularly because I had discussed this issue for couple of years with my close friends and the same issue was accidentally initiated in this group. As Mani has mistaken, I was not even referring to Vedanta Desika or Manavala Mamuni or even Visistadvaita for that matter. The only thing that caught my interest was the issue " to strive for spiritual progress or leave it God's grace"- this issue is very fundamental and I have had disagreements with a number of well known spiritual leaders whom I sincerely have great regard for even now!!. I have this disadvantage of being a close acquaintance of many religious leaders in our sampradaya. This has given me easy access to them and also at times made me commit "bhagawatha Apacharam", since I have taken freedom to freely discuss these issues face to face with them without hiding any of my feelings and questioning them very seriously. I have always been humble in my own style, even though I dont come across that way. In fact I have seen many devotees being so humble that they dont even stand up and ask acharyas any question. They think that they are not informed enough to ask such questions. I have always been different. If I cannot ask a question to such acharyas who else is there who can really put our questions to rest; moreover, why would I ask lay folk and "laukika" people such questions- knowing well that I may not be totally convinced by them anyway? Coming to the issue, since I have had disagreements with several folks regarding this issue of "Effort Vs. Grace" (please note I am not talking about prapatti and its different modes). This relates to the fundamental concept of karma in hinduism and not only restricted to visistadvaita philosophy. complete exaltation of "Grace" could practically mean "fatalism" which is against hindu karma theory. If I have mistaken some issue, I request the bhagawathas in this group to clarify. If Grace does not mean fatalism what is the definition of grace and what are its limits ? Asmad Gurubhyo namaha Sri krishnarparnamastu Krishna Kalale 619-658-5612 (phone) 619-658-2115 (fax)
- Next message: Mohan Sagar: "Re: Response to some BHAKTI issues"
- Previous message: Jaganath.Bharadwaj_at_nrecatao.nreca.org: "Rama and demigod worship"
- Next in thread: Mohan Sagar: "Re: Response to some BHAKTI issues"
- Maybe reply: Mohan Sagar: "Re: Response to some BHAKTI issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]