prabandham and commentaries
From the Bhakti List Archives
• May 31, 1995
Till very recently, I was of the opinion that one hardly needed any commentaries to interpret aazhvaarkaL and their prabandham. I was of the opinion that just a little bit of thamizh knowledge is sufficient to understand pretty much the entire prabandham. I was completely mistaken. I had rarely looked at a full length commentary except once when I read through the commentary of prathivaadhi bayankaram annangaraachchaariyar on siRiya thirumadal and periya thirumadal. I also knew that periyavaachchaan piLLai had written extensive commentaries on prabandham (I am not sure whether he had commented on every bit of prabandham), but I hardly knew the quality of his commentaries. I had read a few passages of piLLai's commentary on some other books but that really did not convey the magnitude of the beauty and the splendour in piLLai's commentary. And then I happened to come across piLLai's commentary on thirumaalai a month or so back (triggered by the discussions on vaNdinam muralum sOlai). From then on, I have been totally captivated by his commentary. It is very difficult to explain piLLai's skills in writing commentaries, his understanding of aazhvaarkaL and his knowledge of the srutis and smurutis. One has to read and experience this oneself. He is simply awesome. My entire outlook of thirumaalai has totally changed now and this is all due to periyavaachchaan piLLai's commentary. What we see on the outset in aazhvaar paasuram is only a tiny fraction of the actual content. piLLai's commentaries are in manipravaaLam. It is thus very difficult to directly understand what he says unless one has a good understanding of both thamizh and sanskrit. Or, one has to rely on "translations" of his commentaries in spoken thamizh (and even here it is useful to know a little bit of sanskrit terminology). Every single word in thirumaalai is pregnent with meaning. Every word has a purpose and I could see the right interpretaions for passages that I had earlier completely misunderstood or thought as inconsequential. For the first time I saw the interconnection between the various paasurams in thirumaalai -- as to why the first paasuram was placed first and why the order in which they appear is important. piLLai quotes extensively, from various sruti works, puraanaas, ithihaasas as well as other prabandhams, and anecdotes from the lives of nancheeyar, battar etc. I would even go so far as to say that piLLai knows more about prabandham than the aazhvaarkaL themselves:-) If you get a chance, read piLLai's commentaries, DO NOT MISS THEM. It is one of the greatest pleasures one can ever experience. If I find time, I will try to post some gems from thirumaalai with piLLai's commentary. My only regret is that there doesn't appear to be a good sri vaishnava commentary of paripaadal (those portions that sing about vishnu). The only old commentary available on paripaadal is by parimElazhakar (a vaishnavite) but that is extremely cryptic. I am trying to obtain as much information on paripaadal as possible. It seems like paripaadal had influenced a lot of aazhvaar's works. I am not sure if the great scholars like periyavaachchaan piLLai were aware of paripaadal. This is truly our loss! --badri -------------------------------------------------- S.Badrinarayanan Graduate Student Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Cornell University --------------------------------------------------
- Next message: Triplicane Vijayaraghavan: "nappinnai"
- Previous message: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Nappinnai and ANdaaL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]