Re: nappinnai
From the Bhakti List Archives
• May 31, 1995
Triplicane Vijayaraghavanwrote: * Hello, * This has reference to badri's posting reg nNappiNnNnai2 * badri wrote: * nappinnai is not aaNdaaL. aaNdaaL herself refers * to nappinnai in thiruppaavai on many occasions. [deleted] * Just because aaNdaaL refers to nappinnai, i dont think that way. [and some more arguments as well as anecdotes suggesting that nappinnai refers to aaNdaaL, deleted] * viji There is not much of an argument here. aazhvaarkaL as well as other poets well before aaNdaaL's time have mentioned pinnai in their copious works. Chronologically, paripaadal precedes the entire aazhvaar works and I suspect the same must be true of silappadhikaaram. As Dileepan mentioned clearly, both these ancient thamizh works mention pinnai. periyaazhvaar does, and he might have done that even before the birth of aaNdaaL. So aaNdaaL is not nappinnai. That said, aaNdaaL could have very well wanted to act the part of nappinnai. She does indeed consider herself as a gopika in aayarpaadi just as periyaazhvaar imagined himself to be yasOdhai. That does not make periyaazhvaar, a yasOdhai and likewise, aaNdaaL, a nappinnai. --badri -------------------------------------------------- S.Badrinarayanan Graduate Student Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Cornell University --------------------------------------------------
- Next message: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Nappinnai and ANdaaL"
- Previous message: Parthasarati Dileepan: "Nappinnai"
- Next in thread: Badrinarayanan Seshadri: "Re: nappinnai"
- Maybe reply: Badrinarayanan Seshadri: "Re: nappinnai"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]