Re: The why of creation.
From the Bhakti List Archives
• May 2, 2002
Dear Vaidhehi What Mani has told is correct reg the "Amalan" - meaning Stainless Lord, here our Poorvacharyas clears the doubt that though He resides within all as AntharyAmi, none of the dhoshams of JeevAthma will attach to Him, He is like a "Tamarai Ilai Thanneer". Reg the 'kaDal ~nAlam ceydEnum yAnE ennum, its a beautiful pAsuram of Anukaram by nammalAlwar. Also reg the creation , Alwar' s pathigam of " Onrum Thevum ulagum uyirum marrum yAthum .." shows He creates nAmugan, and other thevAs after pralayam, and during pralayam no one other than Him will be there .. I feel this shows the Parathvam of Him (correct me if I am wrong), In this pathigam Alwar says dont think only Paramapadha Nathan has the parathvam , our ArchA moorthy (polindhu ninra pirAn - Thiru kurugoor ) which is known for soulabyam and totally expects some one to even move from one place to another , also has the parathvam - excellent piece by Alwar. Here our poorvAcharyas explains the dual but contrasting qualities of Him as "AghadithaGadanA" sakthi (correct me if I am wrong) . The contrasting one is "vYabhagam" - seen by the above anukaram paasuram and "AntharyAmithvAm" But as Mani told I have not encountered a answer for why? I think its "leelA" Adiyen Ramanuja Dasan Gunaseelan Venkatachary Ph - 408 588 6672 (W) guna_venkat@el.nec.com -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: vaidhehi_nc: "Re: Expansion verses Creation"
- Previous message: mani2: "Re: The why of creation."
- In reply to: mani2: "Re: The why of creation."
- Next in thread: snk110: "Re: The why of creation."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]