re: question on creation
From the Bhakti List Archives
• May 2, 2002
srImathE rAmAnujAya namah, dear devotees, The following are just my thoughts regarding the issue of creation. Please take it in that spirit. regarding creation the following seems to be two possible scenarios.. scenario (1): karma is beginningless. Souls are beginningless. Souls are stuck in the birth/death cycle. the Lord is unaffected by the karma cycle, but He constrains Himself (or is constrained?) to provide the fruits/punishments according to each and everyone's karma (except for the saraNAgathi escape hatch). And in His infinite kindness, He works constantly to save souls from being perpetually in the karma cycle. scenario (2): karma and souls were created by the Lord, and are under His complete control. All these are created by Him for His leela. (actually, we might never understand why He does it). Due to His infinite kindness, He works constantly to save the souls from being perpetually in the karma cycle. There are pros and cons of each scenario. For scenario (i), the questions that arise in me are "So, is the Lord just a supersoul who found us caught in this samsAra and is trying to rescue us?" "Given our relationship with Him, as the things that constitute His body, how is it possible that the infinite Lord finds His own constituents in a state of cyclic birth/death and *then* works on rescuing us?" For scenario (2), the question that arises in me is "Why does He have to create souls/karma and then put the souls into this sorrow and then rescue them?" As far as the pramANAs etc. go, to my limited exposure, it seems like vEdAnta texts support scenario (1) and the nAlAyiram supports scenario (2). for e.g. thiruvAymozhi - "aaruyirEyO agalidam muzhudum padaiththu idandhu uNdu umizhndu aLandhu".. rough translation - "Oh the dear one who created, saved, swallowed, regurgitated and measured the entire universe". And in many other verses, the word "padaiththal" (creating) is used in the sense of creating souls and everything else. To me personally, I find the latter appealing. I want my Lord to be all-powerful, unconstrained and unquestioned. For I know that His kindness is limitless AND that He does what is the best for ALL his constituents (though we may not appreciate it, or recognize it). Given such a Lord who spares no efforts to rescue me (who is His property),would I like Him to be constrained by anything? Also, the eternal relationship between the soul and the Lord, the one of complete servitude (sEshatva) resonates very well with the second scenario. After all, we owe our very existence to Him, so it makes sense that we are completely subservient to Him. That still leaves the question of "Why?" - There can be no answer to this I feel. If we use the word "leela" in the generic sense, then we leave Him in a position where we can technically ascribe cruelty to Him. the AzhvArs use the word "mAyai" (mAyA) to refer to His deeds, and that might be the most illuminating explanation. We just do not know and cannot find out. With respect to scenario (1), I do have the "sarvamukthi" question - If the souls are not created by anyone, theoretically, one fine day, there will be no soul in the leela vibhUti.. Every soul will be in nithya vibhUti, and does this universe cease to exist then? If one considers that the souls can be created at will be the Lord, then of course the question of sarvamukti does not arise in the normal course of things. Of course, if HE wishes everyone to be in srIvaikunTa, he will take everyone, but then "sarvamukthi" is not forced on Him. adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan, varadhan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: vaidhehi_nc: "Re: The why of creation."
- Previous message: Krishna Kashyap: "RE: The why of creation."
- Next in thread: vaidhehi_nc: "Re: question on creation"
- Reply: vaidhehi_nc: "Re: question on creation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]