An explanation on "Prahlada StOtram"
From the Bhakti List Archives
• May 26, 2000
Dear Bhagavatas: With reference to the series on "PrahlAda StOtram" recently featured on the net, a fellow Bhagavata has raised a very important point saying - "The Devas requested Shree Maha Lakshmi to go near him and make him calm. She made Bhagavat Prahlada to do this. This is not in the meaning that Shree Maha Lakshmi was also having fear to approach the Lord. She is eternally present with the Lord in all his aspects inseparably. She made Bhagavat Prahlada to go near the lord and make him calm only to show the greatness of Bhagavat Prahlada Alwar." The Bhagavata is correct. There is no denying the fact that ThAyAr is eternally present with the Lord in all his aspects inseparably. In the Introduction to the series, I have only quoted from Sri Uttamur Swami's foreword to the work, which runs as follows: Inter alia, Uttamur Swami observes - " In all other Avatars, the PurushAkaram of PirATTi was manifest; In this AvatAram, He showed that even without this, a true devotee could approach Him. That is why Periya PirATTi permitted PrahlAda to approach the Lord. Following him, the other celestials approached Nrisimha" She bade PrahlAda to approach. In a way, this itself can be construed as PurushAkAram! As Swami Desikan points out in the very first stanza of his "DasAvatAra StOtram" all these AvatAras constitute His leelas. "dasadhA nirvarthayan bhoomikAm" which means the Lord "enacts a drama" taking different roles (vEshams) in the leela vibhuthi and as for ThAyAr, she "dons suitable roles to enact". 'nAyikA prithakvidhEshu bhAvEshu anuguNAm bhAvAn svayam bibhrathi" and She is also said to "play" "viharathE". It is the great author of Srimad BhAgavatam (in which blossomed this "PrahlAda StOtram" ) who says in so many words that "Sri MahAlakshmi also did not approach Him because His appearance was neither seen nor heard of ever before". sAkshAth Sree prEshithA dEvai: drishtvA thun mahat adbutham/ adrishTa- asrutha poorvathvAth sA na upEyAya sankhithA// (SlOka 2) Meaning "Seeing the anger of the Lord not quenched, His consort, Sri MahAlakshmi was sent by the dEvas. She too, did not approach Him because His appearance was neither seen nor heard of ever before". 'She sent PrahlAda "because His appearance was neither seen nor heard of ever before" (adrishTa- asrutha poorvathvAth sA na upEyAya sankhithA). The word 'sankhithA' is very significant. It means she was indeed afraid and was doubtful whether to approach the Lord. While vEdanta avers that they are inseparable in terms of "AgalakillEn enru.." etc. and "thinaithaLavum viDA Aravinda lOchananai" etc., in the drama they enact they have to portray sentiments (bhAvas) appropriate to their dramatis personae. Incidentally, the word "Personality" is derived from "per sona" -- per (like) and sona (sound)" which means "sound like the one whom one portrays". This does not detract from their inseparability. If it were not a drama, why should Sri Sita be abducted and why should Rama bewail to every tree, river , etc., asking whether they had seen Sita. If it were not a drama with a purpose to show us how human beings would and how they should react under similar circumstances -- the very purpose and meaning of the "SitAyA's Charitham mahath" would be lost! Similarly, even if ThayAr had "acted" as if she was also afraid to approach Lord Nrisimha, it only fits very well in "her role in the drama" of this AvatAra and is proof of Her extraordinary talents even in "acting"! Hope this clarifies. Dasoham Anbil Ramaswamy ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Was the salesman clueless? Productopia has the answers. http://click.egroups.com/1/4633/4/_/716111/_/959710052/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information
- Next message: Ramanbil_at_aol.com: "Doctrine and the Drama"
- Previous message: Madhavakkannan V: "engum suRRi Ranganaich chEr.. - athraiva srIrangE sukhamaasva.."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]