Re: Archa thirunakshatram
From the Bhakti List Archives
• May 23, 2000
> I think it becomes patently obvious as one researches > the various sthala-purANas that they are of relatively > recent date, concocted by patrons or priests of a > particular shrine to enhance its antiquity and ancestry > in the eyes of the believing public. The sthala-purANas > usually are an amalgamation of local legend and pure > fantasy. Many were probably not intended as serious > histories of the deity or temple at all. I've always wondered why (or how come, rather) there is such a proliferation of divya sthalams in the southern part of the Indian subcontinent - especially when almost all the vibhava avataras existed in the north. Certainly appears to have more to do with history than with divinity, i.e. the revival/evolution of certain religious traditions during the last two millennia, coupled with the constant threat of Moslem invasions after the first millennium A.D. In any event, I was reminded just recently that Srivaishnavism recognizes only SEVEN svayamvyakta archa forms, including the SAlagrAmam. All the other divyasthalams have been consecrated through pratiSThai/samprokshaNai. I would appreciate it if knowledgeable members could list those seven svayamvyaktas. Personally I would be content with obtaining authentic information about just the svayamvyakta khSetras - the other sthala purANas although well intentioned, could be simply a result of devotional fantasies. Therefore I request some help in finding out "true" origins of svayamvyakta kShetras. Along the same lines, it would be very useful to "investigate" the sthalapurANas of various other divyadesams and determine how much of those (if any) derives from ancient sources like Vishnu PurANa, prabandham etc. Where does all this leave our 108 divyadesams (and perhaps) all their sthalapurANas? Are we questioning the legends of certain kShetrams outside the fold of the 108 only, or does our inquiry extend into every temple town including the svayamvaktas? If and when we do separate the wheat from the chaff, what will we be left with? I believe that Sri. Vijayaraghavan wrote in response to Sri. Sadagopan's reply to me about the archa thirunakshatram of Kanchi Varadaraja PerumaL. I was quite curious to know in the first place, how an archAvatara could have a thiru- nakshatram, what that really meant, and if it was based on the Vishnu purANa. I will appreciate any responses to my questions. Thanks in anticipation, aDiyEn -Srinath Chakravarty email: xsrinath@ti.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Old school buds here: http://click.egroups.com/1/4057/4/_/716111/_/959120731/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information
- Next message: Vijayaraghavan Srinivasan: "Re: Archa thirunakshatram"
- Previous message: Ramanbil_at_aol.com: "PRAHLADA STOTRAM - 6"
- Maybe in reply to: schakrav_at_gators.de.sc.ti.com: "Archa thirunakshatram"
- Next in thread: Vijayaraghavan Srinivasan: "Re: Archa thirunakshatram"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]