Re: Fwd: Krimikantha
From the Bhakti List Archives
• May 16, 2000
> --- In bhakti-list@egroups.com, VAgarwalV@c... > wrote: I can not comment on the wisdom of engaging some of the Internet type trouble makers :-) for they show utter lack of faith for the traditional wisdom of all traditions except their own. In this case some textual support seem to have been enlisted ... for greater authenticity I suppose. Since this list itself is not confined to Srivaishnava's, one may look at the relevant data *as available upto now* and see what emerges. At the outset I'd like to say that Hari Rao's work on Koil Olugu etc is well known but it's clear he follows the school of thought that if the story's not to be found in epigraphical records, it is a fabrication. I am amazed that the same scholars do not look at *contemporary* textual sources and other interlocking pieces of data from other areas. Reverting to your post, there seem to be three issues here: 1. Was Sri Ramanuja really persecuted? So did he actually go to Mysore? 2. Was KurattALvAn really blinded? 3. Were the Cholas or a specific Chola pursue a policy of intolerance towards Srivaishnavam Q1. Was Sri Ramanuja really persecuted? So did he actually go to Mysore? It is interesting in this context what BR Gopal (Ramanuja in Karnataka - An Epigraphical Study, New Delhi, 1983) says about the kind of information provided by inscriptions themselves: "They make no reference to the religious and social conditions of the times, unless they are directly concerned with them, as in the case of the famous Sravanabelagola inscription ... Hence it would be too much to expect from these epigraphs any direct information about Sri Ramanuja. But whenever they do refer, they are the most authentic and contemporary evidences'. (p. 3) So did Sri Ramanuja visit Mysore? Yes, he did ... based on any number of inscriptions which refer to Srivaishnavas consecrating temples. Also, inscriptions tally with some crucial material in the hagiographies. For example, the sAligrAma inscription of the 12th cent which talks of "embArum, ALvAnum, AccAnum" of the maTha of Srirangam which has been identified as embAr (Govinda), AnantALvAn (AnantasUri) and kiDAmbi AccAn. cf. M.E.R, 1913, p. 36; also pp. 12, 13 of the Dynastic List of Inscriptions, E.C. vol XIV; VN Hari Rao admits that "this is the most important contemporary evidence that goes to prove the traditional account of Ramanuja's visit to Mysore". cf.VN Hari Rao's doctoral thesis , pp 167-168. So was his visit a regular tour (digvijayam) or was it undertaken under extraordinary circumstances? If it be argued that former were the case, "his return to Srirangam would have been certain. In this connection, it may noted that kUresa in one of his hymns (Sri SundarabAhustava, verse 130) prays that as in the past, he should be in the service of Sri Ramanuja at Srirangam. Thereby he prays to God that Sri Ramanuja should return to Srirangam. If Sri Ramanuja's (visit) were simply a tour, kUresa would not have made such a prayer. Hence, that there was considerable opposition and even threat to life at Srirangam which made the acharya abandon the place, appears almost certain?" (BR Gopal, ibid., pp 12-13) Q2. Was KUrattALvAn really blinded? An acharya like kUrattALvAn is not going to refer to his blindness in his works much. So it would be futile to look for direct evidence in his works for the blinding episode. There are nevertheless couple of references which may be utilized as pointers. For kUresa, "service is the ultimate aim but KUrattALvAn makes a mysterious further request: O Lord of unsurpassed compassion! O sea of patience! O source of everything! Since I am caught up in several attachments, I pray for something (yat kim api). Pray grant me this. (Varadarajastavam 90) Tradition says that in these verses kUrattALvAn is making a veiled request that the Lord return his eysight." (cf Vasudha Narayanan, The Way and the Goal,Washington DC, 1987, pp 103). Prof Narayanan adds, " More explicit is kUrattALvAn's request at the end of the SundarabAhustava (SbS): O Lord of the forested hills! You brought back to life those killed in the battle at Lanka. You revived the son of the twice born who died young. you recovered SandIpani's child and you gave life to the fetus that hailed from the race of Arjuna. You are constant. How can you not grant the desire of my guru and me?(SbS124) This stotra, written in tirumAlirumcOlai during kUrattALvAn's exile, confirms that kUrattALvAn was separated from Ramanuja. It is important because it is the earliest reference of its kind and comes from a nonhagiographical source. kUrattALvAn's requests to be reunited with his guru and his veiled request for "something" (eyesight?) are significant, for they come immediately after he takes refuge with the Lord." (ibid., p. 104) Q3. Were the Cholas or a specific Chola pursue a policy of intolerance towards Srivaishnavam? The answer is a resounding yes, at least to the second question. For various reasons, Hari Rao thinks the contemporary king is Kulottunga I and since his inscriptions involving grants are recorded in the Srirangam temple, he was not intolerant and ergo, the entire Srivaishnava tradition of persecution against their darsana is a fabrication. This is quite absurd as the whole thing hinges on some dating arrived at from conventional sources. If one were to assume a date 50 years later than hitherto accepted, one would arrive at Kulottunga II as the contemporary king. This king's record does show that he was a saiva partisan and quite possibly an anti Vaishnava bigot. The evidence comes from Chidambaram where it is well known that Govindaraja swamy sannidhi was right there by the Siva shrine. (cf Periya tirumozi 3.2.1 thru 3.2.10 and perumAL tirumozi 10.1 thru 10.11). It is equally well known that a famous court poet (oTTakUttar) boasted that the king he served had "thrown an image of Vishnu in to the sea at Chidambaram". He makes the claim three times once each in his KulOttungaccOLan ulA, rAjarAjaccOlan ulA and takkayAkapparaNi. These are cited in B. Natarajan, The city of the cosmic dance, New Delhi, 1974. It is equally well known that Sri Ramanuja was involved in reinstalling of Sri Govindaraja Swamy in Tirupati at the site of an existing Parthasarathy temple. For a complete chronology and narration of these episodes, plse refer TKT Viraraghavacharya, History of Tirupati, 3 vols, TTD, Tirupati, 1997, pp. 244-287. Hope this helps, LS __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Was the salesman clueless? Productopia has the answers. http://click.egroups.com/1/3019/4/_/716111/_/958501972/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information
- Next message: Krishna Kalale: "Is today narasimha jayanthi?"
- Previous message: Anand Karalapakkam: "Re: nature of the soul and its liberation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]