Does vibhutvam of ParamAtma negate the presence of jIvAtma and achEtana?
From the Bhakti List Archives
Anand Karalapakkam • Fri May 12 2000 - 09:41:35 PDT
SrI:
SrI Lakshminrusimha ParabrahmaNE namaha
SrI Lakshminrusimha divya pAdukA sEvaka SrIvaN-
SatakOpa SrI nArAyaNa yateendra mahAdESIkAya namaha
Dear devotees,
namO nArAyaNa.
adiyEn was going through some of the relatively recent
discussions/questions and saw the following one to be
unanswered.
Question:
SrI L.Harikumar presented a question of his friend
(an advaitin), which in essence says that, If ParamAtma ie.
Brahman is infinite (vibhu), how come other tattvas like
jIvAtma and achEtana be really existing, since it will
contradict the infinite nature of Brahman. The argument is
that, if at all jIvAtma and achEtana exist really, Brahman
does not occupy those spaces occupied by these tattvas
and thus Brahman can't be said to be infinite (vibhu).
Reply :
The presence of chit (jIvAtma) and achit is not at all a
violation of the vibhutvam ie. all pervading nature of
ParamAtma. Your friend who objected that the very
presence of chit and achit violates Sruti in teaching us
that ParamAtma is infinite, is certainly not aware of
infinite mathematics. Also, there are scores of other texts
in Sruti which teach us the presence of chit and achit apart
from ParamAtma.
We know that, Infinity + 10 is Infinity.
From it, we can obtain the result that Infinity - 10 is
also infinity.
Proof :
Infinity + 10 = Infinity
=> Infinity + 10 - 10 = Infinity - 10 {sub 10 from both sides}
=> Infinity = Infinity - 10
=> Infinity - 10 = Infinity. {Switching over RHS and LHS}
We know that Infinity + Infinity is also Infinity.
From it, we can get the result that Infinity - Infinity is also
to be Infinity.
The steps in the previous proof can't be strictly employed
in this case, since we can't cancel Infinity - Infinity to
be zero similar to how we cancelled 10 - 10 to be zero.
Moreover, adiyEn doesn't want to get into the subtraction of
Infinity from both sides.
We need to know what is Infinity - Infinity. Lets assign
x = Infinity - Infinity.
Now, Infinity + x = Infinity { according to the rule of
addition to Infinity ie.
anything added to Infinity
is again Infinity }.
=> Infinity + (Infinity - Infinity) = Infinity {expanding x}
=> (Infinity + Infinity) - Infinity = Infinity
=> Infinity - Infinity = Infinity. {According to rule of
addition, Infinity +
Infinity = Infinity }.
Thus, x = Infinity.
adiyEn (a non-mathematician) does not see any flaw in my proof;
But if it is there, adiyEn requests Mathematicians in the list to
kindly point it out. Anyway, the result that Infinity - Infinity
= Infinity is valid, and sophisticated proof(s) by mathematicians
might be there in their literature.
Thus, eventhough chit and achit many occupy infinite space,
ParamAtma can still be infinite. There is absolutely no
contradiction. Thats the beauty of infinity and the infinite
ParamAtma !!
adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan,
anantapadmanAbhan.
krishNArpaNam.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Best friends, most artistic, class clown Find 'em here:
http://click.egroups.com/1/4054/4/_/716111/_/958170829/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
- SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com
Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information
- Next message: M.S.HARI (Madabhushi Sarangarajan Hari): "Re: [A doubt]"
- Previous message: R. Narasimhan: "Re: A doubt"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
