Re: Lord Narasimha
From the Bhakti List Archives
• March 17, 2003
Dear Sri Parakaalan, Following comes to my mind as an answer, please padron me if I am not clear. Lord took these avataras under different circumstances and at different times too. One could not wait for the other as there was a long time gap. Lord took Varaha avararam to protect Bhudevi from captivity of HiranyaakShan. She called for help. So per lord's statement " paritraNam sAdHoonam......" he took that avataram to protect dharma. Varaha being a very strong animal to excavate any thing burried, it was an apt form to take to rescue Bhudevi burried deep in muds below the sea. In case of Narasimha avaratam, Parhaladan did not call for help. Lord took the most complicated avataram to make his bhakta's words about omnipresense of god come true. dAsan-Shrinath V Kambanwrote: saprema pavinaya pranams .................. while the lord face his enemies ravan and kumba karn in ramavathar and sisupala and thantha vakra in krishna avatar why had to take two avatars for hiranyaksha and hiranya kasibu ( varaha and narasimha) with regards parakaalan --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: shrinath mk: "Re: Lord Narasimha"
- Previous message: elayavalli: "Re: new memeber (Sri Parthasarathy Perumal)"
- In reply to: V Kamban: "Re: Lord Narasimha"
- Next in thread: Srinath Venkatakrishnan: "Re: Lord Narasimha"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]