Re: Kaikeyi
From the Bhakti List Archives
• March 12, 2003
Dear Bhagavathas, Neither Kaikeyi or Dasharatha did any adharmam. It may be apriyam. After all, Kaikeyi had two boons to cash on and dasharatha was bound by dharma to fulfil them. Sri Rama did feel bad and cursed his dad and mom a bit, but never once said it was adharma. Rama went along, does it mean he supported adharma? Ge did not say it was adharma, are we one up on Him on the issue of dharma? dAsan K. Sreekrishna Tatachar [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: sadagopaniyengar: "Re: [Oppiliappan] Digest Number 335-Thitthikkum Amudu"
- Previous message: champakam: "SrI vishNu sahasra nAmam - Slokam 87 - amRtASah."
- Next in thread: K Balaji: "Re: Kaikeyi"
- Reply: K Balaji: "Re: Kaikeyi"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]