Re: Srimad Ramayana Tatthva Deepika - Ba:la Ka:nda (5)
From the Bhakti List Archives
• March 20, 2002
Dear Bhagavata, I very much appreciate your offerings. Would you kindly define the terms (as excerpted from the posting cited below) for me: (a) a Thapasswadhyaniratha (b) a vagvidamvara and (c) a munipungava. >"A disciple should have one basic qualification >and the acharya should have three qualities. >An acharya should be: > >(a) a Thapasswadhyaniratha >(b) a vagvidamvara and >(c) a munipungava." Ys, Jagadish das > _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Madhavakkannan V: "Re: vithuvakottu ammaan and kulasekara azvar"
- Previous message: Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan: "Re: The Moustache"
- Maybe in reply to: Ramanujamma Mudumbai: "Srimad Ramayana Tatthva Deepika - Ba:la Ka:nda (5)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]