Re: Digest Number 563 ( Once upon a time... )
From the Bhakti List Archives
• March 19, 2002
Per the "evakaara" in the quote below, should we infer that nirguNa- brahma (=akhila-heya-pratyaniika-brahma) is not to be worshipped? rAmAnuja-dAsa //Ramkumar > It is pointed out in the purANa ghattam that Sri vyAsa > maharshi ( sutra kAra ) also indicated that in all > para vidyAs, only saguNa Brahma has to be worshipped". **** > 'para vidyAsu sarvAsu saguNa mEva BrahmOpAsyam. phalam *** > caika rUpamEva atO vidyA vikalpaha". -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: mani2: "Re: Digest Number 563 ( Once upon a time... )"
- Previous message: sadagopan iyengar: "The Moustache"
- In reply to: Maruthi Pavan: "Re: Digest Number 563 ( Once upon a time... )"
- Next in thread: mani2: "Re: Digest Number 563 ( Once upon a time... )"
- Reply: mani2: "Re: Digest Number 563 ( Once upon a time... )"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]