Re: phala-tyAga vs. phala-sanga-tyAga
From the Bhakti List Archives
• March 12, 2002
--- In bhakti-list@y..., "tg_ram"wrote: > W.r.t sAtvika-tyAga, some people mention a "phala-sanga-tyAga". > > What does this "phala-sanga-tyAga" mean? > > Is it possibly subtly different than "phala-tyAga"? Dear Ramkumar, 'phala-tyAga' literally means renouncing the fruit of action. That is, if one performs an action, whatever fruit accrues should be offered to God as his -- Isvara-arpaNam. The difference between this and 'phala-sanga-tyAga' may be just an issue of when in the course of doing activity one renounces the fruit. All action, whether religious or secular (vaidika or laukika), should be performed with the attitude that one is not the doer and that one has no involvement with the fruits of that action. When commencing and when engaged in the *performance* of the action, one should also not be *motivated* by the fruit, for such motivation will also lead to further attachment and further karma, whether or not one actually attains the fruit itself. This attitude can be cultivated only be recognizing that one is not the doer, and that all ultimate doership rests either with God or with the three guNas. This, I think, is what is termed 'phala-sanga-tyAga', renouncing attachment to the fruit (while performing action). These principles are so important they are repeated at the beginning and the end of the Gita. We may find a few of slokas along with Sri Ramanuja's commentary particularly illuminating. One relevant sloka is Gita 18.23: That obligatory act which is done without attachment, done without aversion or passionate desire, without seeking its fruits, is said to be enlightened (sAttvika). niyatam sangarahitam arAga-dveshataH kRtam | aphalaprepsunA karma yat tat sAttvikam ucyate || Here Sri Ramanuja comments that "done without attachment" means "without attachment to the idea that one is the doer, etc." (kartRtvAdi-sanga-rahitam). "Done without aversion or passionate desire" means "not done out of desire to win fame or aversion to notoriety, i.e., performed without great fanfare." Plus, the actor should not have any attachment to the resultant fruit (aphala-abhisandhinA kAryam). Another sloka is the famous Gita 2.47: To work alone is your right, and never to the fruits. Do not be impelled by the fruits of work, and at the same time never have attachment to inaction. karmaNy evAdhikAras te mA phaleshu kadAcana | mA karma-phala-hetur-bhU: mA te sango 'stu-akarmaNi || Here Sri Ramanuja specificially says that 'karma' refers to all action -- the obligatory daily and occasional rites, as well as any so-called 'kAmya' rites, those conventionally done for the sake of the result. In another comment he also includes the ordinary acts we do in the world (sarva-vaidika- laukika). He goes on to say: You who aspire for moksha (liberation) and who are established in 'sattva' (goodness) have only the right to action. You have no right to the fruit which are known to result from those acts. Acts done with an eye for the fruit bring about bondage. And acts done without an eye for the fruit purely as my worship become a means for moksha. In addition, do not become an agent of acts with the idea of being the reaper of their fruits. ... Even while performing acts, established in sattva and aspiring for moksha, you should not look upon yourself as the agent. Even while satisfying your hunger and taking care of other bodily necessities you should meditate on yurself as not being the agent of action. The reason for this attitude is to attain evenness of mind, to be free from the enemies which are rAga and dvesha. Being free of these enables one to successfully focus on worship, service, and clear contemplation of the true nature of the self and God. This is only what I have gathered from a brief reading of Sri Ramanuja's Gita bhashya. I invite other members to share whatever thoughts they have. rAmAnuja dAsa Mani -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Rajeev Karamchedu: "Re: Re: phala-tyAga vs. phala-sanga-tyAga"
- Previous message: Ramanujamma Mudumbai: "Sri Ramayana Tatthva Deepika - Ba:la Ka:nda (4)"
- In reply to: tg_ram: "phala-tyAga vs. phala-sanga-tyAga"
- Next in thread: Rajeev Karamchedu: "Re: Re: phala-tyAga vs. phala-sanga-tyAga"
- Maybe reply: Rajeev Karamchedu: "Re: Re: phala-tyAga vs. phala-sanga-tyAga"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]