Yatidharmasamucchaya of Yadavaprakasa
From the Bhakti List Archives
Unknown Sender • Tue Mar 13 2001 - 14:18:57 PST
Sri Yadavaprakasa, the teacher of Sri Ramanujacharya (d. 1137 CE)
authored an excellent manual on the conduct of Sannyasins, named
the 'Yatidharmasamucchaya'. It is a collection of relevant passages
from the Dharmashastras (primarily) in various matters related to
Sannyasadharma, arranged in 11 chapters. Signficantly, per the
tradition, the manual was composed by the author as a repentence for
following Advaitin modes of Sannyasahood, when he later became a
student of his own ex-student Sri Ramanuja, the great teacher of
Visishtadvaita Vedanta.
The Vaishnava mendicants are associated more closely with the
householders, temple institutions compared to the 'ekadandin' Advaita
monks (at least theoritically). They are very meticulous with regard
to maintaining the sacred thread, shikhaa etc. Olivelle says:
Pg. 17 Reading Yadava's work closely, one gets he distinct impression
that the Brahminical ascetic is a very exalted type of Brahminical
householder rather than a figure who contradicts the value system
represented by domestic life. Whatever is prescribed for a Brahmin in
general applies also to an ascetic.
Pg. 25-26 The ascetic is not an outsider to that community but a
significant and integral part of it. The ascetic is not in the
wilderness removed from the social group; he has truly reentered the
village. This is what I have called the domestication of asceticism.
This domestication was more thorough within the devotional (bhakti)
traditions in general and in the Vaisnava tradition in particular.
With its doctrine of total inner surrender to divine love (prapatti)
and the supremacy of divine grace in the work of human salvation, a
householder and an ascetic have equal access to God. Even though
Yadava still speaks in hyperbolic terms about the superiority of the
ascetic over the householder (see. Ch. 6.296-308), the Sri Vaisnava
tradition would gradually drift away from the centrality assigned to
mendicant asceticism.
Following is a brief summary of the 11 chapters, based on the
critical edition cum translation of Patrick Olivelle (see reference
at the end).
__
Contents:
1. Chapter I. The Rule Sanctioning Itinerant Asceticism: It
examines whether the Sruti really enjoins the order of Asceticism
(Samnyasa Asrama). The views of certain opponents within the
tradition are quoted to the effect that the Vedas enjoin only the
householder's vocation for a complete discharge of the 3 debts that
one is born with. Therefore, asceticism is anti-Vedic because an
ascetic cannot discharge these three debts properly. Yadava quotes
authoritative passages from the Brhadaranyaka Upanishad, Mahanarayana
Upanishad (Taittiriya Aranyaka, Prapathaka X), Jabala Upanishad. He
emphasizes that Moksa is the supreme goal enjoined by the Vedas, and
this supreme goal is attained with the help of Samnyasa.
2. Chapter II discusses the suitable age for a person to become
an itinerant ascetic. Yadava quotes a multiplicity of views found in
the Hindu scriptures in this regard, without choosing or preferring
any. Thus, he quotes passages to the effect that asceticism should be
resorted to only after the birth of one's children or grandchildren,
or at any age (even before marriage), or that renunciation before
marriage is permissible only for the handicapped or the detached
people, or that renunciation is also possible just before imminent
death.
3. Chapter III relates to the external insignia of a mendicant,
and deals with a hotly disputed topic within Hindu spiritual
tradition. Yadavaprakasa firmly sides with the opinion that sacred
thread, the triple staff, water strainer, the loincloth/waistband and
the water pot cannot be abandoned by ascetics. However, there is an
option with regard to the top knot or the Sikha. The
Tattvasagarasamhita, a Pancaratra text, is cited at 3.48
4. Chapter IV deals with the procedure whereby a person becomes
an ascetic. The chapter takes the `Saunakiya Samnyasavidhi' as its
basis, supplementing it with quotations from other Smrtis. The text
of Saunaka, no longer extant today, is certainly an ancient one, and
makes extensive use of Vedic mantras from Rigveda, Taittiriya
Samhita, Brahmana and Aranyaka etc. At the end, he gives a special
procedure for renunciation when death is imminent.
5. Chapter V deals with the principal activities of an ascetic.
It starts with a discussion of the classification of ascetics.
Yadavaprakasa rejects the fourfold classification into Kuticaka,
Bahudaka, Hamsa and Paramahamsa found in certain texts because
according to some of his contemporaries, this classification was
rooted only in Samkhya and Pancharatra texts. Manu, on the other
hand, classified mendicants only into two divisions- those who were
itinerant mendicants, and those who stayed at home but renounced the
Vedic rituals. While discussing the duties of the former, he quotes
the Kratu and other smrtis to the effect that Samkhya and Yoga ought
to be adhered to, where Samkhya means a knowledge of the 25
cosmological principles. Thereafter, he defines and discusses the
various limbs (eg. Pranayama) and virtues (like truth) of Yoga with
the help of various Smrti texts and concludes with a description of
the rewards of practicing all these. It is clear that Yadavaprakasa
here discusses a Sesvara variety of Yoga, against which he does not
appear to have animosity at all. He ends the discussion of Samkhya
with the words- 5.46: One should similarly explore also other texts,
such as the Epics, the Puranas, the Dharmashastras of Manu etc. and
also the Upanishads to learn about the Samkhyan categories, and also
the meaning of the term `Samkhya'. (pg. 77)
6. Chapter VI discuss the daily practices of ascetics, starting
with their morning chores, adding that the duties of householders
ought to be replicated where no description of similar duties for
mendicants is available in the scriptures. He discusses the correct
procedure for begging, the procedure of eating, rites following the
meal, and evening duties. The chapter ends with a discussion on the
appropriate behavior of a householder towards an ascetic who has
approached for food.
7. Chapter VII deals with the virtues and general code of
conduct for mendicants – celibacy, speaking beneficial words,
forgiveness etc. Significantly, one of the restrictions on a
mendicant is that he should not expound the Puranas and Epics to the
laity (7.99)- a restriction meant to prevent the mendicant from
enhancing his popularity in the society.
8. Chapter VIII discusses rules pertaining to insignia of a
mendicant (like the triple staff) and other related penances. The
chapter ends with the remarks that the mendicant should not be
attached even to these articles that he possesses.
9. Chapter IX: Since the Yatidharmasamuccaya is meant for
itinerant monks, this chapter deals with rules pertaining to the
wandering and residence of monks. An ascetic is not allowed to make a
permanent residence (which rules out monasteries) except during the
rainy season, when he can stay in one place for four months. A
separate description is given on what ought to be done (or not ought
to be done) by the mendicant during these 4 months.
10. Chapter X deals with penances for sins that an ascetic might
commit intentionally or otherwise. It is pointed out that penitential
observances have to be performed for sins committed habitually or
deliberately, while yogic practice is prescribed for sins committed
inadvertently.
11. The last chapter deals with the procedure of cremation of
monks by householders and post cremation ceremonies. It is emphasized
that the salvation of monks is not dependent on performance or non
performance of these ceremonies by anyone, and the post cremation
ceremonies for a monk are fewer and simpler than that for a
householder.
Among the texts cited by Yadavaprakasa are:
Dharmasutras of Gautama, Baudhayana, Apastamba, Vasishtha
Yogasutra of Patanjali
Mahabharata and Gita
Dharmasastras of Manu, Likhita, Sankha, Galava, Kratu, Sandilya,
Satatapa, Jamadagni, Harita, Devala, Daksha, Dattatreya, Sumantu,
Vishnu, Yajnavalkya etc. In many cases, different recensions of these
texts are distinguished- for instance, Manu and Vrddha Manu
Dharma digests of Maskarin, Medhatithi
Vedic texts: Jabala, Bashkala sruti, Taittiriya Aranyaka,
Brhadaranyaka Upanishad and so on. The metrical Bashkala Sruti is
cited only in some manuscripts and 3 of the 4 verses are cited
elsewhere in the Yatidharmasamuccaya with a different text designated
as their source. It is clear that the `Sruti' is in reality a
defective text rather than a passage from a lost Vedic text.
The Yatidharmasamucchaya exists in two versions- a short and a longer
one. According to Olivelle, the latter is the authentic, original
version of the text.
Reference:
Olivelle, Patrick; Rules and Regulations of Brahminical Asceticism;
SUNY; New York; 1995
--------------------------------------------------------------
- SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -
To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com
Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Malolan Cadambi: "Photos of Srimad Azhagiya Singar's Thirunakshatram."
- Previous message: Sadagopan: "Re: Divya Desams in Kancheepuram"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
