Re: prostrating four times.
From the Bhakti List Archives
• March 5, 2001
Dear Members, The responses regarding the number of praNAmams are very interesting. I would like to write the following points regarding the same. On the count of doing praNAmams, it has to be done only in even numbers like 2, 4 because it is SAstra vidhi. The following pramANams may be noted down in this context: "PradakshiNAn praNAmAnScha yugmAnEva samAcharEth na vishamAn" manthraiScha vaishNavaissthOthrai: sthuthvA dEvam janArdanam | praNamEd dviSchathurvA(a)pi anyathA kilbishi bhavEth || (prapancha sAram, deekshA prakaraNam) "After worshiping SrIman nArAyaNa: by chanting vaishNava mantras, one has do praNAmams in count of two or four in even numbers." Therefore, the vidhi for proper number of praNAmams in even numbers like 2, 4 is clear from this. I have seen SrI Vaishnava scholars correcting those who do single praNAmam with the correct performance of the same in counts of two or four... I also like to mention when praNAmam can be done and when it should not be done as follows: "apUjyA: yathra pUjyanthE pUjyA: yathrApamAnithA: | thathra thrINi vivardhanthE durbhiksham maraNam bhayam ||" (dharmasAram) "One has to praNAmam etc before only those who are worthy to be worshiped. If some one worships those who are not worthy, then three evils namely scantiness, death and fear will grow there" This means that only SrIman nArAyaNa: and SrI VaishNavas are to be worshipped by followers of parama Vaidika matham. Even if a person is a qualified brAhmaNa, if he does not know/do prathyabhivAdanam, then he must not be considered for sEviththAl, abhivAdanam etc. (prathyabhivAdanam - when a person does abhivAdanam, the other person who receives the abhivAdanam must do ASeervAdam "AaushmAn bhava" etc and then tell the name of the person who did abhivAdanam with the last letter in the name in pluthaswaram - neettal) If a person is knowing the above prathyabhivAdanam but if he is carrying samith (logs used for vaidika yagnya etc), flower, Tulasi, darbham (a particular grass considered to be very sacred and used in certain vaidika karmas), agni (fire), water, soil, cooked rice then he must be avoided at the moment of he carrying these things. Once he keeps these things in a suitable place, we can do praNAmams to him. Similarly, we must not do praNAmams to a person at the time of he performing vaidika karmas like japam, homam etc. After he finishes these things, then he is fit for us to do praNAmams. Similarly, we must not do praNAmam when a person is eating or sleeping. "yagnyE rAjagruhE sangrgE praNamEnnAbhivAdayEth" We can do praNAmams to bhAgavathAs in yAga-sAla, king's court, sabhA etc but at these places, one must not do abhivAdanam to a person. If a tridandi sanyAsi is younger to another tridandi sanyAsi in terms of chAturmAsyam, anushtAnams etc., then the younger tridandi sanyAsi can do praNAmam to elder tridandi sanyAsi. "swadharmasthAn yathIn vrudhdAn dEvAnScha praNAmEdyathi: | nAnyamASamiNAm kinchith praSasthamapi namEth ||" (prapanna dharma sAra samuchchaya: yathi vishayE yathi dharma samuchchaya prOktham viSEsham) Even if a grahasta is well qualified and doing his swa-dharma perfectly, tridandi sanyAsi must not do praNAmam to the grahasta. Here it is observed that SrI Bhagavath rAmAnuja yatirAja swAmi (sanyAsi) did praNAmams to grahastas who where swAmi's AchAryas. I consider this as exception because it is the case of doing praNAmams to AchArya. I would appreciate inputs from scholars in this regard. A grahasta who is well qualified and doing his swa-dharma perfectly, on seeing a true tridandi sanyAsi, must immediately do three praNAmams chanting the SrImath AshtAkshara mantra. Otherwise, he becomes impure. Here the SAstra has specifically mentioned "namaskAra- -trayam charEth" & "namaskAra-trayam kuryAth". Therefore, this count is in this special case. One must strictly NOT do praNAmams to a person who thinks SrIman NarAyaNa is equal to anya-dEvathas. Similarly, one must strictly not do praNAmams to kudrushtis like prachanna-bowdhas, Veda-bhAyas, anti-vedic (avaidika) vEsha-bhUsha-dhAri persons and pAshAndis. If these people who are prohibited are worshiped, then prAyaschiththam has to be done. I would like to mention that the Tenkalai VaishNavas differ from the count of praNAmams as told in this mail ie., 2, 4... But I suggest that this difference of opinion in this regard between both the schools may not be considered as a subject of serious debate. Instead of considering this difference in count of praNAmams between the two schools as 'difference', I request you all to consider it this way - doing praNAmam or praNAmams is common to both the schools. I feel that this is a good approach for being united in this regard also. Thanks & Regards M.S.HARI rAmAnuja dAsan (mshari@usa.net) ____________________________________________________________________ Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: VAgarwalV_at_cs.com: "Purva Mimamsa"
- Previous message: VAgarwalV_at_cs.com: "Old commentators of Brahmasutras - A note"
- Maybe in reply to: Mohan Sagar: "Re: prostrating four times."
- Next in thread: Malolan Cadambi: "Re: prostrating four times."
- Reply: Malolan Cadambi: "Re: prostrating four times."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]