Re: sampradayam
From the Bhakti List Archives
• March 8, 2000
--- Geetha Ramaswamiwrote: > vanakkam, what is widely happening (IMO) is that> sambradyams have> lost their appeal because most people are not able> to explain> either the logic behind those traditions or their> significance > to the younger ones. Very good point. The question to ask is why have we all lost the ability to appreciate and explain the "logic" of our religious tradition to younger ones. Because there are not enough good teachers/tutors around. When I was a very young boy back in my native town our community "vAdhyAr" himself was a fairly erudite man who besides carrying out his usual "vAdhyAr" duties was also perfectly competent to hold discourses on "purAna", "vedanta" and Srisookthis. He could explain some basics fairly well in a simple, arresting and effective way even if not with the eloquent aplomb of a regular "veda-vid". Today there is none within our immediate neighbourhoods who can offer us such sage counsel and education on matters of religion, tradition and philosophy. All our "vAdhyAr-s" are so heavily over-committed to duties of performing rituals, marriages, punyAvachanam, seemanthams and tarpaNams etc. that they hardly have time to sit and explain to young community members about the beauties and wonders of "sampradAyam". Thus we all are forced to either buy heavy books on the subject, or to listen to 'upanyAsam' lectures or tapes of famous scholars or go in search of some vedic scholar who lives somewhere else and is willing to individually spend some time with us in explaining what you call the "logic" of our religious traditions. Unfortunately, the situation (in India at least) today is that acquiring even primary understanding and awareness of our "sampradAyam" has become a scholarly pursuit in its own right. Having acquired the most basic knowledge and understanding of your relgious tradition today you become not so much a good SriVaishnavan as a "scholar in Vaishnavism"! > I completely agree that we should find a way that > these valuable teachings are not completely lost > and I have a suggestion for it. How about making > the life history of acharyas as amar chitra kathas? > These still appeal a lot to kids and when I go to > buy> them for my nieces and nephews I've to search hard> to find> one which they haven't read! Even the teachings can> be> imparted to kids in the way of stories. Good idea. Perhaps publishers of "Nrsimha-priya", "pAduka" and "hayagriva-priya" and other will take note of your idea and give it a try. But you know the problem is that there is not enough circulation going around for existing publications even.... but that's a different story... Secondly, not many people (adults and children alike) have patience for long-winded stories these days. They want you to get to the point immediately! And, alas, the best of "purAnic" stories are invariably long and long-winded. > On a tangential note, my cousin couldn't complete > his> 8 years in the vedic school at Madurantakam because> of economic situations. I'm sure there are similar> circumstances in which pupils drop out of this > school. The late Kanchi paramAchArya once told his disciples, "None of you needs to worry about funding and finance for my veda-patashAlA-s. I will somehow take care of it. But will you all ensure that at least one of your children or your immediate family will pursure his mission lifelong in Vedic pursuit? Can you all promise to send me one of your children? If you can do that, then let me tell you this: don't worry about the economics or management of this... leave it all to me and I will handle it all myself." The moral of the story is : funding for a Veda-pATashAla poses a problem only when you want other people's children going to it. If your own child happened to be going to one such school funding will take care of itself! The ParamachAryA always had an uncanny ability to get to the heart of a matter in a cold-blooded, clinical, no-nonsense sort of way! All disciples gathered there that day .... and there were many high-ranking IAS officers, doctors and lawyers there amongst the gathering.... all of them simply remained silent and shame-faced! > Among other things how about setting up a fund so > that> these people get some stipend atleast in their last> two years?> Its really hard to attract pupils to such schools (i> know of only > this one - may be there are others). > As the Kanchi-AchAryA pointed out, again, funding is not really the major problem here! Our value-system is! > hope members don't mind my casual language! > Geetha. Not all, Madam, I rather like your style! I wish more members like you on the list would switch to normal conversational style of writing! dAsan, Sampathkumaran __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - aazhvaar, emberumaanaar, desikan, jeeyar tiruvadigale saranam - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get one email address for all your friends! Start a free email group on eGroups! http://click.egroups.com/1/1881/2/_/716111/_/952502772/ eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/bhakti-list http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
- Next message: T. R. Govindarajan: "Difference in Agama sAsthras"
- Previous message: mani_at_alum.calberkeley.org: "Religious Calendar"
- Maybe in reply to: Geetha Ramaswami: "sampradayam"
- Next in thread: Mohan Sagar: "Re: sampradayam"
- Reply: Mohan Sagar: "Re: sampradayam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]