lakshmi-nrsimha-karAvalamba-stOtram-19
From the Bhakti List Archives
• June 17, 1999
Dear bhAgavatOttamA-s, The last post (No:18) ended saying that the clue to understanding Sankara's poetic metaphor, "samsAra-vruksha", in the 8th stanza of the "lakshmi-nrsimha-karAvalmba-stOtram" Â… the clue to understanding that particular term lies in probing what the 'Tree of Knowledge or Life' is really all about: "samsAra-vruksha" (or the 'World Tree', which with the help of the 'Brittanica' entry we learn) is the "VITAL CONNECTION BETWEEN THE WORLD OF GODS AND THE HUMAN WORLD", the "SOURCE OF TERRESTRIAL FERTILITY AND LIFEÂ… and is PROTECTED BY SUPERNATURAL GUARDIANS". The above definition, when taken at both face and real value, leads us to believe the "samsAra-vruksha" Sankara was referring to in this verse of the LNKS wasÂ… unmistakably Â… the "Vedas". For, if anything definitive at all can be said about the Veda in layman terms it is certainly this: (1) It is a great 'Tree'. (2) It is protected by supernatural guardians. (3) It is the connection between the world of gods and the human world. (4) It is the source of terrestrial fertility and life. (1) Why is the Veda poetically conceived as a great "vruksha"? The word 'Veda' is derived from the Sanskrit root "vid" Â… i.e. "to know" and the "veda" thus literally means "Knowledge". This 'Knowledge' is conceived in the form of a great Tree. The Tamils, in fact, refer to the Veda as "marai", "maramOduvadhu" etc. And the variant "maram" literally means "tree" in the Tamil language. All those who embrace the Veda know only too well that every possible characteristic of a great tree is in fact associated with it. Hence: --- Chapter 15 in the Bhagavath-gita (about which we will have more to say in the following posts) begins with the ringing, esoteric words: " sri bhagavAnUvAcha: "urdhva-moolam aDah:shAkham aswattham prAhur avyayam chandAmsi yasya parNani yas tam veda sa vedavit" II (Thus spake Bhagavan Krishna: "There is a banyan Tree and it has its roots going upward and its branches going down! It has the Vedic hymns for its leaves! He who knows this Tree knows the Vedas too!") --- The "manu-smriti" says: "vEdo'khilo dharmamulam"Â… where "mulam" refers to "root", which is to say, "The Vedas are the ROOT of all "dharmA"", --- The Vedas are also commonly known to be divided into 4 "shAkA-s" i.e. tree BRANCHES of learning called Rg., Yajur, Sama and Atharva. --- Then the Vedic Tree is also known to have its LIMBS called "vEdAngas": "siksha", "vyAkarana", "chandas", "nirukta", "jyOtisa" and "kalpa". These in turn further are said to STEM out into "upangA-s" called "meemAmsa", "nyAya", "purAna" and "dharmasAstra". --- If the Veda is a Tree, the "AchAryA-s" also explain, then the "samhita" may be said to be its FOLIAGE, the FLOWER its "brAhmaNa", the unripe FRUIT its "Aranyaka" and the mellowed FRUIT its "upanishads". (2) Next, why is it said that the Veda is "protected by supernatural guardians"? The Veda is "apowrusheya" and "anAdi"Â… It is as ageless and limitless as the cosmos. It has no authorship. It has no such thing as a "first published date". In pre-history it seemed to have been all revealed to seers ("r-shis") as Pure Sound ("mantrA") in moments of true inspiration. Over the centuries only once (under the aegis of the great Sage Vyasa) has the Veda ever undergone any sort of "revision" and re-issued as a sort of "new edition". Thereafter neither abridgement nor embellishment has ever been necessary for it. Until about a few thousand years ago not a word of it was ever written downÂ… not on stones or tree-barks and not on palm-leaves or paper. Instead it remained indelibly etched in the memories and hearts of men. The Veda perpetuated itself as the priceless and unchanged legacy one generation of Man left behind in trust for another through aural and oral traditions of bequeathing. During the march of millennia, from primordial time to pre-history, from pre-history to history and right until the present day, the unwritten Veda sometimes waxed and wanedÂ… and much of it went under the eclipse of human neglect and desuetude too. But the Veda dimmed only because Man's faculty to apprehend it dimmed; never was the Veda in itself extinguishedÂ… Like the macrocosm the "r-shis" said it reflected in earthly microcosm, the Veda remained, as it does to this day, eternal and unbounded in an utterly supra-mundane Reality of its own... "anantAh: vai vedAh:"Â… What keeps the aural Reality of the Veda intact and timeless? Who or what is the agency that is responsible for its preservation? Does it have a 'guardian angel' to stand guard over it? How has it survived? Who protects it from the ravages of Time and the tide of human history? No one can categorically answer such questions for sure. For, to ask "Who is the guardian of the Veda?" is like inquiring, "Who is the guardian of the Cosmos?"Â… It is often explained by the Vedic Masters , the "AchAryA-s", that if it is accepted a Supernatural Being is the guardian of the Cosmos then we might as well accept that the same Supreme Being is also the guardian of the Vedas. It is for the same reason why the "purAnA-s" are full of allegorical stories of how the Veda came to be preserved, protected and propagated by the 'avatars' of God Himself. All those "purAni-c" accounts serve, in fact, to only underscore and reiterate the divine guardianship of the Vedas. In this context, those of you who are familiar with the "hayagriva-stOtram" of Swami Vedanta Desikan will quickly recall a beautiful and oft-quoted verse from the hymn (Stanza#8): "mandOBhavishyan-niyatam virinchO vAchAm-niDhE vanchita-BhAga-DhEya-ha I daityApaneetAn daya-yaiva BhuyOpi aDhyApayishyO nigamAn na chEtvam II (I am not going to translate or explain the verse since I'm pretty sure most of you are already very well acquainted with the famous "hayagriva-stOtram"). (3) The next question: "Why do we say the Veda is the "connection between the world of gods and the human world"? The answer in the next post. adiyEn dAsAnu-dAsan, Sudarshan ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
- Next message: Ramakrishnan Balasubramanian: "Re: Post 3d) Classification of relas -Reply"
- Previous message: Kalyani Krishnamachari: "nAcciyAr tirumozhi IX - Sindurac cempoDi - Introduction"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]