(no subject)
From the Bhakti List Archives
• June 25, 1998
"Shree Bhoomi Neekla Samethae Shree Lakshmi Nrusimha Parabramaneya Namaha" dear Bahagvadhothamaas, I) adiyen have understood that "Sthrees" and "Others" are not supposed to make an attempt to understand Vedic chants which is why those days the vedhass were chanted by splitting the "padhaas" and still keeping the real meaning which is not just easy to understand by any average ........... remeber Brahdharanyaka upanishadh is a resultant of "Maithreyee's" enquiry in to bramhan ( maithreyee is sage yaagnaavalkyaas wife) and we have yuga dharmaas so few dhramaas that were practised in one yugaa is not applicable in someother yugaa. many are not clear on these points as no vast research is done on the above or it is not widely and popularly known as it deserves to be.. Those days vedic chanting was done by splitting the "padhams" so that those who were not supposed to understand the meaning and purport didnot get it anyway..as it requires a great knowledge in sanskrit grammer... Nowdayas many chant vedaas without even understanding what they actually mean!! what adiyen mean to say is that only few know sanskrit nowadays as compared to so many those days!! adiyen would surely consult "swaamis" and "poorna adyaayanna adhikaaris" and get a detailed answer to this particular qusetion as adiyen has neither basic knowledge of sanskrit nor has done "adhyayanam" II) the charma sloka says leave all and surrender unto me!!! i'll save u!! The prapathi or surrender is rahasyaa aartha or the essence and no where the essence of sashthraas and scripture is clearly stated and if it were there would be no different school of thoughts.. our aachaaryaas have consulted so many sashthraas analysed compared and found that "prapathi" is an easy way out!!! u do prapathi only once and u do prapathi only when u are a "asahakthaa" to do other yogaas. every other commentator accepts the concept of "self surrender" and prapathi is done only as "AANGAA" of bakthi yoga and it is NOT AN ALTOGETHER DIFFERENT PATH adiyen has not done any "kaalakshebaam" so adiyen humbly request for few days time to answer this with pramaanaass..
- Next message: Greg Jay: "Re: Validity of the Samhitas (was Re: Am Namo Narayanaya)"
- Previous message: Krishna Susarla: "Validity of the Samhitas (was Re: Am Namo Narayanaya)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]