Book Review - CONTRIBUTION OF YAMUNACHARYA TO VISISHTADVAITA:
From the Bhakti List Archives
• June 2, 1998
[THE HINDU] Tuesday, June 02, 1998 SECTION: Entertainment Books Section Index | Previous Story | Next Story | Core tenets of Visishtadvaita Date: 02-06-1998 :: Pg: 28 :: Col: d CONTRIBUTION OF YAMUNACHARYA TO VISISHTADVAITA: M. Narasimhachary: Sri Jayalakshmi Publications, Hyderabad. Distributors: Sri Gopal Publications, 3-3-860, Lane Opposite Arya Samaj Mandir, Kachiguda, Hyderabad-500027. Rs. 300. There is a pleasant irony in the title of this book which discusses Yamunacharya's contribution to Visishtadvaita. The term Visishtadvaita is never used either by Yamunacharya or Ramanuja. It is a post-Ramanuja expression coined, we do not know by whom, to bring out the distinctiveness of Srivaishnavism nurtured by the ecstatic outpourings of the God-intoxicated Azhvars. It was Nathamuni who collected the floating psalms of these mystics into the Nalayira Divya Prabandham, set it to music and introduced its recitation as an integral part of Srivaishnava temple worship in South India. Since none of the original works of Nathamuni himself has come down to us we have to consider his grandson, Yamuna, as the earliest Acharya who systematised the philosophy underlying Srivaishnavism. And on the solid foundation laid by Yamuna, his brilliant grand-disciple Ramanuja, raised an edifice that tantalises us by its exquisite format. The appellation of Visishtadvaita must have become necessary later on to underline the difference of Srivaishnava philosophy from those of monistic Advaita and pluralistic Dvaita. Visishtadvaita steers a smooth middle path between Advaita and Dvaita. But the term itself is not easy to translate into English. The usual translation, qualified monism, does not do justice to the subtlety of its insight into the organic unit of God, the individual soul and the universe. Scholars split the word in two ways. ``Visishtasya Advaitam'' means the non-duality of One who is qualified. The One is Lord Vishnu and His qualification or characteristic feature is that the sentient (Chit) and insentient (Achit) entities are His body. He supports, controls and makes use of them. Another interpretation would be ``Visishtayor Advaitam,'' the Oneness of the Lord, who exists in two different states - the causal state and the effect state. In the causal state, God has the subtle Chit and Achit as His body, whereas in the effect state He has the gross Chit and Achit as His body. Either way the ``Sarira- Sariri Bhava,'' the cornerstone of this philosophy, is forcefully presented. Yamuna, no less than Ramanuja, staunchly upholds this concept. So, though he does not use this term there is no denying the fact that Yamuna's contribution to the Visishtadvaitic view of life and Reality is substantial. ``A rose, called by any other name, would smell as sweet''. The amount of spade work the author has done to unearth the gems embedded in Yamuna's composition is quite remarkable. He has gone through all available writings of Yamuna with a fine tooth comb and wherever there are gaps he has tried to cement by reference to obiter dicta made by later commentators like Vedanta Desika. He has given a detailed analysis of the contents of Sristuti, Stotraratna, Gitarthasangraha, Agamapramanya and the Siddhitraya and traced the evolution of thought in these masterpieces. Visishtadvaithins take pride in declaring that theirs is not just Vaishnavism, but Srivaishnavism because of the unique position accorded to Sri or Lakshmi in their theology. This aspect is well brought out by Yamuna in his Chatussloki wherein he has explained the crucial role played by Sri, who is literally the bosom companion of the Lord. Eternally associated with the Supreme Being, Sri represents the most exalted quality of God - Daya or mercy. The Lord rules by law and Lakshmi by love. She wins the Lord by Her natural sweetness and beauty and acts as the compassionate mediator between God and the Jiva. The Stotraratna, the sequel to the Chatussloki, establishes Lord Narayana as the means (Upaaya), the end (Saadhya) and the goal (Praapya) of all human endeavour. Yamuna bows down in all humility before the paradox of the supremacy (Paratva) of the Lord riding in tandem with His easy accessibility (Saulabhya). This `gem of a hymn' highlights in a set of mellifluous verses the unfailing efficacy of total surrender to the Lord (Saranagati or Prapatti). The thirty-two verses of the Gitarthasangraha give an epitome of the teachings of the Bhagavad Gita which in turn is the essence of the Upanishads. Ramanuja acknowledges that his own masterly commentary on the Gita was inspired and guided by this work of Yamuna, who stresses that loving devotion to the Lord (Bhakti) is the saadhya while karma and jnana, selfless service and realisation of one's subordination to the Lord, are the saadhanas. The Agamapramanya is devoted to establishing the revealed character (Apaurusheyatva) of the Pancharatra Agama literature. Yamuna revels in crossing swords with the Bhattas, Prabhakaras and Advaitins regarding the validity of Pancharatra. The Siddhitraya, the longest and most important of all the compositions of Yamuna, is the source book of Ramanuja's Sri Bhashya, for Ramanuja freely quotes or adapts many of the arguments and points of philosophic importance employed by Yamuna. The Atmasiddhi discusses and establishes the true nature of the Aham; the Isvarasiddhi establishes the existence of the Supreme Being; and the Samvitsiddhi refutes the Advaitic conception of Maya and the Buddhist conception of Samvit or consciousness. The author has thus succeeded in bringing out the immense impact of Yamuna's works in moulding the core tenets of the charming philosophy that has come to be known as Visishtadvaita. C. S. Ramakrishnan --------------------------------------------------------- Section Index | Previous Story | Next Story | --------------------------------------------------------- Front Page | Lead Stories | National | International | Regional | Opinion | Sport | Entertainment | Miscellaneous | Classified | Home | Site Map | Search | Archives | Advertisers | What's NEW | About HOL | Feedback |
- Next message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: indian nuclear tests"
- Previous message: Anand Vangipuram: "Clarification"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]