QUALITY of a srivaishnavan - Sri Visu's comments
From the Bhakti List Archives
• June 25, 2002
SRIMATHE RAAMNUJAYA NAMAHA Many thanks to Sri Visu for making me think more on this subject. He says, > Even though Smt. Jayasree captions the quality as "desirable", she tends to > make it obrigatory This is about the purachinnangal. I was very careful in dealing with this topic that I almost behaved like a 'madhil mEl poonai'. All that I wanted to convey was that the purachinnagal was not the be-all and end-all of a sv. The individual may or may not adorn them, led by his circumstances and he is the best judge of his circumstances. (I have heard the horrific tales of how my people in Tanjore had to wipe out the oordhwa pundaram, hide their shigai and poonool and run for life when the anti-brahmanic triade was carried out by the DMK in the seveties.) In today's conditions too, things are not very rosy - something we must acknowledge.And there may be other reasons too whiich I leave to the individual to judge and decide. I wanted to sound less dogmatic and less ambiguous too in this aspect in my post. But to a deep-probing mind, the ambiguities become well-detected:-)) So let me tell why I made it look obligatory while I was actually clubbing it along with the desirables (I used the term 'basic' as an inter-changeable one to 'desirable'- another proof that I didn't want to say the last word on this issue) # I thought I will be offending scores of sv-s if I say that the purachinnangal are 'just' desirables and nothing more. I didn't want to do that - a true sv must not hurt others (attractive quality) and I try to be one! # It is said that Sriman Narayana comes to reside in the body that is adorned with the purachinnangal - it is for this reason, dwaadasa manthras are recited when one wears the thiruman kaapu- Though symbolic, I didn't want to appear to be on the adverse side by making debatable remarks. ( another point to note: Almost 99.99% of sv-women do not follow the srichooram code in daily life. Still are they not sv-s? -I know I am touching upon another controversy. But let us speak out) # I strongly believe that the purachinnagal alone do not make one a sv, the must-be and attractive qualities also are to be adopted in all earnestness. So I want to say there is more to do with aga-chinnangal than to be complacent with the purachinnangal. # And lastly I have my own debates and inferences why the purachinnangal came to acquire so much importance over and above the other qualities. For this I can quote the words supposedly spelt by Yama dharma raja and Sri Krishna. As I couldn't get to know the exact source, I didn't use the following in the previous post. Thirumazhisai Alwar has said that Yamadjharman instructed his messengers to prostrate before the sv-s. The sv-s can be identified in the following way. " Ye baahu moola parichinha shanka-chakra: Yeva lalaada palakelasa oordhwa pundra: Ye kanda lagna thulasi nalinaaksha mala: Teh vaishnava: bhuvana maashubha vidhrayanthi" The sv can be identified by the shanku-chkra chinnam, oordhwa pundaram and the thulasi maala. Sri Krishna was said to have instructed his dwaara- paalagas, before leaving the fort of Dwaaraka, to allow sv-s inside, who can be identified by the shanku-chakra dhaaranam and the oordhwa pundaram. " chakraangitha: praveshtavyaa: Yaavadaagamanam mama, Naamudhritha: praveshtavyaa: Yaavadaagamanam mama" The insistance on pura chinnangal in the above two instances made me wonder, why they had not laid the stress on the other spiritual qualities (the must-be and the attractive in our reckoning). In fact the qualities of people in those days (pre-kaliyuga) pursuing athma-vidhyai must have been of a highest order, irrespective of the sect they belonged to. May I reason out this way? The mental and spiritual qualities of the seeker, irrespective of his sect are the same. Like the different streams rushing to unite with the same ocean, these seekers are in the same direction. But only the 'kozhu-kombu' (that which they cling to) is different. For some it is Vishnu, for some it is Shiva. Therefore, the need must have arisen to differentiate a sv from others, just by seeing, i.e., by appearance. The sv-s who were the highest epitomes of the srivaishnava-lakshna, adorned the purachinnangal to show others that they are Emperuman adiyar. Today it is the other way round. The purachinnangal seem to remind us that we must live to be a sv! (no offence meant) I agree with the following words of Sri Visu:- It seems to me that the external imprints > (purac/cinnaGkaL) are symbols of character and not of baptism. > > Unlike the other three components, the imprints need not serve any purpose > for the initiate. On the other hand they proclaim to the community that this > person being a Shri vaishNava can be expected to demonstrate a certain > behavior. In the case of Muththanathan (in Sri Visu's post),the purachinnangal were regarded as symbolising the inner sublime qualities that they come to symbolise. Muththanathan was an exception than a rule in those days. The imposter was spared of his life, because of the purachinnam Today if someone attempts to do a Muththanathan, we know what will happen to him. Because the purachinnam does not corresspond to the aga-chinnam in today's context.That is why we keep harping upon the other two types of qualities to anoint one as a true sv! Now once again to Sri Visu: , the > story makes a point that is valid today. > > It seems to me that the pundram is a trademark which carries with it a > warrarnty. Under the product warranty, I would have sued muttu/nAtan and > claimed compensation! Muththanathan is not the original, only a duplicate. The company will not comply with Mr Visu's demand!!! I beg to differ from Sri Visu on the warranty clause. I think warranty is out of place in this context. Warranty deals with replacement of the defective parts. In spiritual realms (even in mundane affairs)the defective ones are not replaced. The faulted one has to face the consequences of his mistakes / sins (Theory of karma -cause and effect) But there is a gauranty offered to the sv - and true to the implication of this word gauranty, a wonderful service is offered by none other than Sri Ramanuja himself. In his (apparantly) last dialogue with the lord before he left for the 'Ponnadi'of Emperuman, he was said to have extracted a gauranty from the lord that He grant mukhthi to all those who have connection with him (Ramanuja sambhandham). That is why the need to surrender at the feet of an acharyan who binds you with Ramanuja sambhandham which in turn facilitates the ascent to moksham. This guaranty is indeed the hope of every sv that he will attain his 'ponnadi' someday due to his Ramanuja Sambhandaham! Reaching out to the acharyan alone will not help unless the sv as an individual, follows the other qualities. The 'gauranty' can not be expected to come to one's rescue (automatically and logically) at the end of the same birth, unless the sv stands up to the other faculties of mental and spiritual nature. It is very clear from the must-be qualities (emphasis on MUMUKSHPPADI Avashyaa-peshitham)that they offer Absolute gauranty to moksha to the sv who is sincere in his efforts. Now the question from sri Visu: > > Finally, I would like to address a question: We have had very little > discussion on: How does a Sri vaishNava handle non-vaishNavAs. I cannot > imagine a dossier of Sri vaishNavas that will omit such an important > question. The question is of special interest to teenagers and young people. > The answer is obvious. The attractive quality is essentially about the inter-personal relationship of the sv. A detailed version of these qualities are listed in Taittriya upanishad, (Sheekshavalli, 11.1 to 11.4) The advice from the Guru, starting with 'satyam vada: dharmam chara' ( speak the truth, follow the dharma)and ending with the art of giving -"Bhiya deyam, samvidha deyam" and the other advices in the same chapter precisely deal with how one must conduct himself in body, speech and mind. In his interaction with a non-sv, if the sv stands steadfast in keeping up with his purity in the tri-kaaraN, that is the ultimate good he will be doing to the sect he swears by. History will then come to speak about not just one Kulashekara alwar, but many. That is the ultimate triumph of SRI VAISHNAVISM, of MANKIND and of CREATION itself!! AHIMSA PARAMO DHARMA: Ahimsa through body, speech and mind! The lead has already been given by Nammalwar, POLIGA, POLIGA,POLIGA POYITRU VALLUYIR CHABHAM..(3128) ... .. VERRUPPINDRI GYAALATHTHU MIKKAR MEVI THOZHUDU VUIMINEERE.. (3135) ...... OKKA THOZHUGITTREER AAGIL KALI YUGAM ONDRUM ILLAIYE!(3137) jayasree sarnathan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Varadarajan Sourirajan: "Thirumaalai-20"
- Previous message: V. Krishnan: "Swamy Nammalwar India Foundation - 3rd Anniversary at Kattumannarkoil"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]