original thiruk kadal mallai located?
From the Bhakti List Archives
• June 2, 2002
Sri: SrimathE Ramanujaya Nama: Dear gourp please forgive me for posting temple related article on bhakti list, did so mainly because of the wide distribution on this list compared to the others. Recently there was a discovery of a large submerged city off Mahabalipuram coast. For some reason, it did not get much attention in India and the local press there. Here are couple of links that give more information about this discovery http://www.india-atlantis.org/ http://www.grahamhancock.com/intro.php The local tradition as well as our Sri vaishnava belief is that the tiru kadal mallai was part of a total of 7 temples of which 6 of them were submerged during a giant flooding event, leaving the shore temple that we see now as the only temple standing. After some time the locals retrieved the moola vigraham from the original submerged temple and installed it in a temple about 1 km from the shore which is what we now worship as 'tiru kadal mallai'. I have looked at 2 books on 108 Divya Desam and they are consistent with this account. They also mention that thirumangai and boothath azhwar sang the praises of the original 'tiruk kadal mallai'. For example in Periya thirumozhi 2.6.8, thirumangai azhwar says "Our lord with his discus resides along with the pingala lord Siva, who frequents the cremation ground, in kadal mallai talasayanam where the celestials in hordes offer worship ... " I am not sure if the presnt day tiruk kadal mallai has a Sivan temple in close proximity for azhwaar to refer to this place in such terms. Now coming back to the topic, there are some pretty startling information on this discovery The National Inst of Oceanography of India has estimated the date of the flood (submerging 6 out of 7 temples) to be 1200 -1500 years back. However, the British team that was part of the expedition has a different take: "I had a chat with some of my colleagues here in the Dept. of Geological Sciences and it is probably reasonable to assume that there has been very little vertical tectonic motion in this region [i.e. the coastal region around Mahabalipuram] during the past five thousand years or so. Therefore, the ominant process driving sea- level change will have been due to the melting of the Late Pleistocene ice heets. Looking at predictions from a computer model of this process suggests that the area where the tructures exist would have been submerged around six thousand years ago. Of course, there is some ncertainty in the model predictions and so there is a flexibility of roughly plus or minus one thousand years is this date." http://www.grahamhancock.com/underworld/underworld7.php So, if we take the British view, then the the traditional dates for azhwars becomes more credible. Sri A. Govindacharya in his book on Holy lives of Azhwars puts the date of Thirumangai azhwar about 2700 B.C. It is possible that the date could be older by 1000 years. Difficult to confirm, but for sure, raises the question. Hope we will find an answer to what is beneath the see and how long it has been submerged soon. adiyEn Venkatesh Elayavilli http://www.srivaishnava.org -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: elayavalli: "GPP 6000 - online"
- Previous message: Narasimhan Krishnamachari: "SrI vishNu sahasra nAmam - Slokam 74 - Part 2."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]