SRIRANGAM GREAT TEMPLE
From the Bhakti List Archives
• June 13, 2000
Dear friends, Regarding the reported offer of having a 'golden ratham' for Sri Rangaraja, Sri Sampath svami has succinctly placed before us two short-term issues and two long-term issues. To consider the short-term ones. Sampat svami is quite right when he says, "If only any one of the bhakthas had approached and explained the matter to the Hosur devotee I am sure he would have reaDILY UNDERSTOOD THE SENTIMENTS and in all probability agreed to do kainkaryam to the Lord in a different form." This is well-taken but since I am on a visit away from Srirangam, I am not in a position to join a deputation to the Hosur devotee. I had nevertheless proposed (in my earlier posting) that without causing him alienation, he could be persuaded to "have the fulfilment of his votive offering ('nErtti') in a much better way. He could perhaps get the 'gO-ratham' chariot of Sri rangarAja renovated and refurbished in time for the next Adi-brahmOtsavam (April 7, 2001) of the month of pankuni ('meena') mAsam. The gO-ratham is the smallest in size of the three chariots of Sri rangarAja, and is the only one which is fully built up as a veritable gallery of wooden sculptures. It has not for years been cleaned and sprayed with wood-preservative and painted. This is the chariot in which the Lord rides out pleasurably on the day following the pankuni-uttiram. It is well-known that the 'uttiram' marks the day when Lord Sri-rangarAja and Sriranga nAcchiAr get together in the year in order to receive the recital of Sri rAmAnuja's moving 'gadya-trayam' submissions. The name gO-ratham symbolises the corpus of the vEda as the Lord's vehicle, and signifies that He is the core meaning of the vEda." I do entirely share Sampath svami's concern when he observes, "I am seeing a number of persons desiring to come into the fold of srivaishnavism and do service to Lord Sriman Narayana. Let all our action invite more and more people into the fold and not get frightened." I am one with him on this and I believe I have said anything in my posting to offend this beautiful sentiment. Sampath svami's second short-term point: "The real issue is the action on the part of the temple authorities in proposing to accept the Golden chariot. There cant be any two opinon on this.... As administrators of the Great Temple they do not have any right to alter the customs and procedures." His other long-term issues are (i) to restructure the system of the Great Temple administration so that the classical position prevails in respect of the worship, festivals etc and (ii) mobilising into effective action for the purpose. "...we talk and write and act very little. I am prepared to gather like minded Srivaishnavas," he says poignantly. I gladly offer my services for their humble worth and shall wait for his message on my eventual return to Srirangam. AS OF NOW, I REQUEST for more postings from the friends of the bhakti-list on this specific topical issue. Also, can someone please move to place the matter with the English-language and Tamil press of Chennai ? aDiyEn rAmAnuja-dAsan, tirumanjanam Sundara Rajan. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyday Is Kid's Day Dad Only Has One Click Here To Make It Special http://click.egroups.com/1/5038/4/_/716111/_/960930208/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information
- Next message: Sadagopan: "Re: Clarification regarding Sri Bashyam Commentary to be published by Desika Bhavanam, Chennai"
- Previous message: Raja Krishnasamy: "Clarification regarding Sri Bashyam Commentary to be published by Desika Bhavanam, Chennai"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]