Sandhyavandanam & Kainkaryams
From the Bhakti List Archives
• July 27, 1999
Dear members, Please forgive me for sneaking into this list, with my ignorance. It is like a crow entering a group of swans. But I am inspired to write something.Please bear with my personal views. Reg. Sandyhavandanam, I fully agree with what Sri. Muralidhar says that kainkaryams take only precedence, but can't replace Sandyhavandanam & japam. Undoubtedly, Sandyhavandanam, is a must. It is the Ajna which our shAstrAs give. It has to be followed as told. But regarding kainkaryams, we can do it according to our taste & will. "SAatram sankalpitta idattil yathA sAstramAi SAstram vikalpitta idattil yathA ruchiyAy kadavathu." as told in Rahasyatrayasaram- shAstraniyamanAdhikAram. Also as the Lord himself says, Shrithi: Smrti: mamaivAjnA yastAm ullanghya vartate AjnAcchedI mama drOhI madbhaktOpi na vaishnava: Shruti & Smrti are my orders. If anyone violates them, I dont consider them as vaishnavas, even though they are my devotees. But it doesnt apply for Azhwars since they were totally immersed in his love. We have heard that Nammazhwar used to recite one pAsuram & faint for almost 6 months in Bhagavadanubhavam. They are not touched by sin whether or not they follow these things. atyanta bhakti yuktAnAm, na shAtram naiva bandhanam!! No shAstra or bandhana applies to them who are highly devotional. please correct me where ever I am wrong. RAmAnuja dAsI Padmini _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
- Next message: vraghuna_at_CALFED.COM: "Re: A Real Life Example! (re real wealth"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: SandhyAvandhanam - Bhagavadhkainkaryam"
- Next in thread: Krishna Kalale: "RE: Sandhyavandanam & Kainkaryams"
- Maybe reply: Krishna Kalale: "RE: Sandhyavandanam & Kainkaryams"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]