Re: SandhyAvandhanam - Bhagavadhkainkaryam
From the Bhakti List Archives
• July 27, 1999
Dear Bhaktas, This whole discussion has operated under the assumption that sandhyAvandanam is something different from bhagavat-kainkaryam, and that one has to make a choice between the two. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me that the trikAla sandhyA and other nitya-karmas must be *included* in the category of bhagavat-kainkaryam, so much so that the whole issue of conflict between kainkaryam and nitya-karma per se should not arise. Do we not declare our nitya-karmas as "bhagavat-kainkarya rUpam" and "bhagavat prItyartham"? Now, if we say that there may be a conflict between viSesha-kainkaryam and nitya-kainkaryam, or between temple kainkaryam and kainkaryam in the form of anushThAnam, well, then I see how this needs to be resolved. Mani
- Next message: padmini ranganathan: "Sandhyavandanam & Kainkaryams"
- Previous message: Kazhiyur Mannar Narayanan: "Members in Calcutta?"
- In reply to: T.V.Venkatesh: "Re: SandhyAvandhanam - Bhagavadhkainkaryam"
- Next in thread: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: SandhyAvandhanam - Bhagavadhkainkaryam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]