SandhyAvandhanam - Bhagavadhkainkaryam
From the Bhakti List Archives
• July 26, 1999
Shri Venkatesh The interpretation that you had given to Azhvaar's paasuram was indeed surprising ! " What is the use of doing sandhyAvandhanam and other such karmAs when actually perumAL kainkaryam gets the priority and importance" Its true Perumal Kainkaryam gets a priority over Sandhyavandhanam. That's only in a comparitive sense. When it is Sandhya kaalam and at the same time if you have to perumal Kaimkaryam, then give preference to Kaimkaryam but still you need to perform your sandhyavandhanam with Prayachistham. You still need to perform but could not neglect it. Is that not the reason why it is called as "Nithya anushtanam" ? No words could explain the importance of Gayathri japam. The learned members of this list should be able to explain much more. Adiyen being ignorant would like to just keep it short. It is Vedas that help us the identify Emperuman. As we are not capable of doing all the veda adhyayana, Mother Gayathri recites them for us(the three veda during the three sandhya kaalams) and we do Gayathri japam or indirectly praise Emperuman with those Vedas. Is that not why you call the upanayam as "Brahmoupadesam" - Calling you closer to show and understand the brahmam ? The best standing example is none other than Emperumaan in Vamana Avatharam. The reason behind he undergoing the Upanayanam and Brahmoupadesam is to only insist the importance of the samaskara. Emperumaan continued this shining example as Rama(Ref: Balagandam as well Yuddha Kandam where Aditya Hrudyam is being refferred) and further in his Krishna Avatra (Refer Story of Kandharva who distracted Krishna from Sandhyavandhanam). Is that not why we say "Yagnobhavitham PARAMAM pavithram" ? The prefix "Parama" or the most sacred one is given to the superlative - Paramapurusha , Paramathma and Paramapavithra. Adiyen if truly of the opinion that Kaimkaryam takes only precedence but cannot replace Sandhyavandhanam and Japam. Daasan Muralidharan
- Next message: jagannathan: "(no subject)"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Agnostic."
- Next in thread: T.V.Venkatesh: "Re: SandhyAvandhanam - Bhagavadhkainkaryam"
- Maybe reply: T.V.Venkatesh: "Re: SandhyAvandhanam - Bhagavadhkainkaryam"
- Maybe reply: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: SandhyAvandhanam - Bhagavadhkainkaryam"
- Maybe reply: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: SandhyAvandhanam - Bhagavadhkainkaryam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]