mutual exclusion
From the Bhakti List Archives
• July 8, 1999
srimathe ramanujaya namaha srimathe thuppul vedantha desikaya namaha srimathe srivan satakopa sriman narayana yateendra mahadesikaya namaha lakshmi natha samaarambaam naada-yamuna madhyamaam asmath acharya paryanthaam vandhe guru paramparaam Dear bhagavathas, Adiyen would like to add on to the discussion on mutual exclusion of three philosphies of advaita,dwaita and visishtadwaita. While it's history that only emperumaanar's bhaashyaa is hailed as sribaashaya ,the other two bhaashyaas have their own author-names appended to the bhaashya sabda.,ie)sankara-bhaashya and madwa-bhaashya.It is also history that ,sri saraswati devi,in kashmir, honoured emperumaanar with an idol of Lord sri hayagriva,and gave the "sri bhaashya" its due title.The sri hayagriva idol,later was ,passed in disciplinic successsion to "nadaathur azhvaan",and then to swami sri Desikan. Today we find the same Lord sri hayagriva ,still with our parakala mutt swami.It is only to substatiate,that emperumaanar's work has divine authentication. Now coming to the philosophy of visishtadwaita or qualified monism,it is in more ways than one ,closer to adwaita.It is true that emperumaanar's doctrine ,is not mere philosophy alone. It also includes,the supremacy of the one and only bhagwan sriman-narayana.In fact visishtadwaita sampradaya is close to madhwa sampradaya ,since sri madhwacharya also declares unilaterally,the supremacy of sri mahavishnu.so,vishtadwaita in contrast to adwaita is both a philosophy and a theology in one. secondly,emperumaanar and swami Desikan strongly refute the doctrine of Maaya and we srivaishnavaas say "Jagat sathyam",this world is real ,they are all appendages og the saguna brahmam-sriman-naraayana, whereas to the adwaitha school the world is Mayaa,the brahmam is devoid of Gunaas,Nirgunam,and all the mummuurthis,siva ,vishnu and brahma are all one and the same parabrahmam. It is clear that the three doctrines of adwaitha,dwaita and visishtadwaita are not totally mutually exclusive.Everybody holds ,that there is a parabrahmam or sat.(Ekam sat viprah bahudaa vadanthi-Truth is one,The learned speak of it in many ways). The real contention is with respect to the individual soul visavis the paramaatma.In the dwaita school the Jivaatma is eternally separate and subservient to the Lord or paramaatma and the world is real.so in a sense dwaita and adwaita are mutually exclusive. But in many ways visihtadwaita is close to the doctrine of adwaita.Only that there is no mayaavada and the nirguna brahmam is replaced with saguna sriman-narayana. we are all extensions of Naraayana,just as the hands and legs of our body are attached to us and are part of us.so even emperumanaar's doctrine is adwaita only.Only that sriman-narayana is ever brimming with all kalyana gunaas. Regarding the vedas being beginningless and endless,adiyeen would like to add that,that in reality the few saakhaas we have in existence today are not to be construed as the end of the book.The vedas are sruuthis,never to be written down,the various rishis mentioned in them are only "mantra dhraashtaas",there was no creator including brahma.They are the life and breath of srimannarayana. It is only krishna dwaipayana or bhadarayana or veda vyasa ,gave us the vedas in codified,he being an avataara of srihari(vyasaya vishnu ruupaya ,vyasa ruupaya vishnave) sarvam sri krishnaarpanam. srimathe ramanujaya namaha. Regards and salutations to all bhagawatas Ravi Desikan Visit our web site for more info: http://www.tripace.com Tel +31 79 3612444 Fax +31 79 3612152 CREATORS OF DATA MOVING WORLDS
- Next message: Narasimhan Krishnamachari: "SrI vishNu sahasranAmam - Slokam 55 - Part 2."
- Previous message: Venkat Nagarajan: "Re: On the nature of Maya and existence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]