Re:Sankara.
From the Bhakti List Archives
• July 8, 1999
Respected members, This is regarding Sri sudarshan's praise of sankara and the objection raised by Sri Mani vardarajan from the point of view of the aim of bhakti list. Sri Sankara really deserves respect for the following :- 1. At the time when the very authority of vedas was questioned (leave apart its contents)and the philosophy of Universal void (Buddhism) was gaining popularity in India along with other perverse and baseless philosophies,Sankara was the rising sun,who brought back the vedas to its original stand by disproving buddhism and other rebellion theories. 2. He brought out the significance of vedantha over the karma-kanda or the works portion of the vedas. 3. His Devotional works,works on renunciation like bhajagovindam etc. 4. Finally taking into account the time in which he completed all this i.e within 32 years.Infact he is said to have mastered vedas by his 8th year.One really has to appreciate the genius in him. Some of the drawbacks of Sri Sankara's philosophy :- 1. According to Sankara, God is the highest reading among realities in the Relative context with jiva and the world following in the sequence.But, from the absolute standpoint he introduces a pure conscious being called as Brahman from the authority of scriptures,which he says is the only reality and the former realities are observed in the same due to a defect called avidya which is neither real nor unreal.Finally God according to him is only a mind purifier of the seeker,wholatter sublates God and himself into the brahman. Now the conclusions of the above philosophy is :- 1. Though God is All merciful,All pervading,All knowing, in the final Analysis he is as good as a mirage which does not have an eternal reality. 2. The seeker is told in the beginning of his saadhana that the god whom he prays is only a moral support or a support for building his confidence whether in this world or in the next and helps in purifying the mind of the aspirant to such an exten Now, No Bhakti school which holds God as the supreme reality and jiva and jagat also as realities according to the same scriptural authority can entertain a Philosophy such as one given above by Sankara,where all the true emotions between Bhakta and Bhagavan are imaginary and are the expressions of a sentimental and Ignorant mind.It is also a great surprise why the Great Sankara composed such Gems of devotional work,which are later rejected by his own philosophy. (Personally I feel somewhere a misunderstanding about sankara's work has happened in the post-sankara period loading the philosophy of such a rare genius,poet and also a bhakta of Narasimha with self contradictions). Finally I feel both Sri.Sudarshan and Sri.Mani Vardarajan are doing justice in their own views and i also request our dear bhagavathas to end this matter afer reading this letter and concentrate ourselves on our Bhagavan whether the slokhas are according to Bhagavan Ramanuja or Sanakara Bhagavad pada or Bhagavan Madhwacharya. These are only my views and my main is bringing all our members together and head in the direction of our Lord together(Following the famous slokha of Rig Veda). Sri krishnaarpanamasthu Regards B.N.Suresh. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
- Next message: Venkat Nagarajan: "Re: On the nature of Maya and existence"
- Previous message: Sheela Belur: "Coping with Conflicting Thoughts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]