Re: Sri.Mani's non-sequitor
From the Bhakti List Archives
• July 6, 1999
Mani wrote: " I felt that mere praise of Sankara (and subsequent denigration of other Vaidikas, such as mImAmsakAs, as "enemies from within"), without proper context, required a response." With the feeling that Mani's comments are too succinct,I would like to add a couple of lines of explanation. Swami EmberumAnAr in theto the SrI BhAshya states emphatically that both PUrva-MImAmsA and Uttara-MImAmsA (VEdAnta)form a continuous whole;and for this statement he brings forward the authority of VrttikAra SwAmi BOdhAyana himself: Since VEdAnta is connected to Jaimini's 16-chaptered Poorva-MImAmsa,they both form a single SAstra. And further on SwAmi EmberumAnAr clearly explains that while PoorvaMImAmsa details the (the method of worship),VEdAnta deals with the (the nature of the Deity which is worshipped).Thus they are forever inter-connected, and the use of the phrase "enemies from within" in respect of MImAmsakas would hardly be appropriate. Also since in Sankara's philosophy there exists only a single attributeless entity,the question of worship and worshipper,which presupposes the existence of a second entity would not arise. I am also an admirer of Sankara's poetry and clarity of expression as in Bhaja Govindam and other Stotras.But his philosophy is a totally different matter. EmberumAnAr TiruvaDigaLE SaraNam! BHARAT
- Next message: sriram suresh: "Stotraratna contd."
- Previous message: Venkatesh K. Elayavalli: "Paasurappadi Ramayanam and other additions"
- Maybe in reply to: sudarshan madabushi: "Sri.Mani's non-sequitor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]