lakshmi-nrsimha-karAvalamba-stOtram-22
From the Bhakti List Archives
• July 1, 1999
Dear bhAgavatOttamA-s, Verse#8 of the LNKS Â… and the poetic metaphor of "samsAra-vruksha" in itÂ… can be understood better if we take a fleeting glimpse into the biography of Sankara bhagavathpAdA. Sankara, by all accounts lived at a time of great social, political, moral and ideological decay. For over 5-6 centuries before his birth, across the length and breadth of the Indian sub-continent, Buddhism had gained ascendancy over the Vedic ethos of the people. Although in the rural areas the mass of ordinary people still clung to the vestiges of Vedic tradition and life-style, the influential middle and upper classes of Indian urban society had all been weaned away into un-Vedic modes of life and thought. Mainstream intelligentsia of Indian society had embraced un-Vedic ideas bordering on unabashed epicureanism on the one hand or had been drawn to the pretentious claptrap of neo-"nirvAnA-ism" on the other. Sankara certainly had a very difficult time rejuvenating the old fire of the Vedic spirit in India enveloped as it was then in the dark and suffocating smog of a multitude of non-Vedic, alien ideologies. In Sankara's time there were broadly two classes of Vedic antagonists Â… one, the "Anti-Vedantins" and the other, the "Pseudo-Vedantins". The anti-Vedantins held Vedic revelation of Truth to be outright execrable. They simply rejected the "sruti" as "pramANam". To this group belonged both proto- and neo-Buddhists of those times. Also included in this group were certain adventitious offshoots of Buddhist thought Â… viz. Jainism, atheists, agnostics, materialism, "chAruvakA-s" and a few others on the extreme, sometimes lunatic, fringe of Indian religious and philosophic thought. The pseudo-Vedantins were stout adherents of Vedic "pramANa" but for all the utterly wrong and most perverted of reasons. They were called "pUrva-meemAmsakA-s" against whom Sankara waged a life-long running feud as bitter as those he is said to have had with the more pernicious anti-Vedantins like the "chAruvAkA-s", for example. The "chAruvAkA-s" or anti-Vedantins, Sankara considered them to be "open enemies" of the Vedic society. They could be dealt with "openly" as adversaries in an all-out ideological war. But the "psedo-Vedantins" or "purva-meemamsakA-s", Sankara considered them to be more dangerous than "anti-Vedantins" for they were "internal enemies"Â… "Vedic saboteurs and guerrilla-artists"Â… He regarded them as "the secret enemy " who kills softly and silently but no less surely than the "open enemy". He regarded them as parasitic vermin gnawing away into the wood and entrails of the very tree on which they lived and fed uponÂ… and who would eventually destroy the great Vedic Tree too from within society. We will continue in the next post. adiyen dAsAnu-dAsan, Sudarshan ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
- Next message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: lakshmi-nrsimha-karAvalamba-stOtram-22"
- Previous message: sudarshan madabushi: "KumbakOnam & ArAvamudan"
- Next in thread: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: lakshmi-nrsimha-karAvalamba-stOtram-22"
- Maybe reply: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: lakshmi-nrsimha-karAvalamba-stOtram-22"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]