RE: the ultimate sharanagathi and personal beliefs
From the Bhakti List Archives
• July 27, 1997
I have been learning much from the discussion of this past week on Visistadvaita Vedanta and SriVaishnava views on the worship of other deities. My compliments to all of you on the enlightening discussion. I am too much the novice to participate in this, but I would like to share a few thoughts just for the purpose of clarifying some issues in my own mind: Mr. Raja Krishnasamy writes: >If we indeed as srI >VaishNavAs are to pray to Lord srIman nArAyaNA only, >and according to some people not even worship other >dieties (so far the discussion in this group has >limited itself to Lord Shiva as the "anya dEvathA"), >why is it that after baraNyAsam, some people pay >their respects to other Sri Vaishnava forms of Sriman >nArAyaNA, such as srI rAmA, or sudarshana AzhvAr, >etc. > >In fact even the various madams have different >presiding dieties. All the 106 divya dEsams have >different purANams associated with them, but then so >too are the dieties of anya religions. It is my understanding that one should not make the distinction that the various forms of the Lord are only "parts" or "reflections" of certain characteristics of the Lord. His appearance in His vibhava or archavathara forms is through His supreme autonomy, motivated by His Saulabhyam such that He can reveal His wondrous form to us and Bestow His Grace. Based on this, I would contend that we really should not attribute different characteristics or see specific gunas within Rama, Krishna, Narasimha, Srinivasa, and Ranganatha, but recognize all of these as Sriman Narayana in all His Fullness, possessing and revealing all His Kalyana Gunas. >Is not some amount of karma attached to these >>dieties as well ? While the puranas about the avatharas and archas do have their place, I would like to suggest that the incidents presented in these were merely used as pretexts by Perumal to descend to earth out of His Compassion. Consequently, I feel that we should not attribute any karma based reasons to these. ------ I have a related question on this topic, as well. I cannot recall the source for this, but I read somewhere that one who has taken baraNyAsam should really only solely worship and prostrate before Sriman Narayana and Thayar, and should only pay simple respects to the adiyArs; i.e., in temples and homes aradhanai (or archana) should be performed only to Perumal with Thayar. The devotee should not perform aradhanai directly to Hanuman, Garudan, etc., but should respect them in the spirit of Bhagavatha Kainkarya. Consequently, when visiting a temple, the devotee should only prostrate before the Lord and perform archana and other kainkaryas to Perumal and Thayar only, taking only darshanam of the adiyArs. Is this correct, or am I mistaken on this? Daasanu Daasan, Mohan
- Next message: KESHAVA PRASAD: "Re: SRI MANI'S REQUEST"
- Previous message: V. Sadagopan: "Possible reference to Jatayu in Sri Aandal's Thiruppavai"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]