Srimad Ramayana Tatthva Deepika - Ba:la Ka:nda (24)
From the Bhakti List Archives
• July 30, 2002
Srimathe Ramanujayanamaha!!! Jeeyar Thiruvadigale saranam!!! The purpose of Na:rada’s visit to Va:lmiki’s ashram (hermitage) was to propagate SriRamayana in this world. As he knew that the ‘para’ Bhagavan had come down to the earth as nara SriRama and established dharma and He was the only one who had all the above mentioned ‘kalyana gunas’ that are enumerated in the Upanishads, Na:rada is answering Va:lmiki’s question glorifying the inherent Brahmathathvam and the peripheral ‘Ramathathvam’. He said, “The gunas you mentioned may be counted as sixteen but there is a possibility that many more gunas are concealed in each guna. It is outside our capability to prove the scope of those gunas. They are unlimited. It’s very difficult to find out.” When Va:lmiki questioned as ‘sixteen’ , Na:rada's reply as “bahavaha” (many), and when SriRama as a human being is there with all these qualities (gunas); his answer as “durlabhaha” shows that these gunas refer to the ‘vedanthavedya-paramapurusha’ and Naradamaharshi was very much aware of it. One guna among them is ‘a:nanda’ and even this single one cannot be described fully or its limits determined properly. ‘Thaitthareeyo:panishad’ had started to determine the extent of the Lord's 'a:nanda'in ‘A:nandavalli’ and left concluding, “yatho:va:cho: nivarthanthe: apra:pya manasa: saha” ‘Bhagavan’s a:nanda can neither be expressed in words nor reached by ‘manas’(mind) . Hence Narada said ‘durlabhaha’. As he understood the hidden vein of Valmiki’s question he started telling about such ‘para’ and ‘nara’ ‘SriRama’. “In Ikshwa:ku dynasty there is one famous person named Rama, praised universally by one and all. Ikshwa:ku was the eldest son of Vaivaswathamanuvu. He worshipped SreeHari for long .The Lord blessed him with the idol of SriRanganatha, the form produced by His sankalpa and in which He presented Himself. Since then the lord Ranganatha had been worshipped by them. Hence that ‘vamsam’ was the most suited for His incarnation and that is the reason behind Narada’s mentioning of ‘Ikshwakuvamsa’. The One who is the moolaka:rana for this universe was born in someone’s vamsa. This is His ‘sousi:lyam’. Valmiki referred this when he questioned, ‘gunava:n kaha’. Na:rada answered, ‘Ikshwaku vamsa prabhavaha’. The Lord is not known by a single name alone. The Almighty has thousand divine names. One who has innumerable names,has taken a single name,'Sri Rama’. Vasishta maharshi meaningfully and perfectly named him Rama as he gives a:nanda to all ,with his gunas. . There are two ‘vyuthpatthys’ “ramayathi ithi ra:maha” “ramanthe: asmin ithi ra:maha” The yogis always keep experiencing the ‘sathya jna:na:nanda swaru:pa’ and the ‘anantha’ the “Parabrahma”. So Rama means parabrahma. As He possesses ‘a:nanda’ and gives others a:nanda parabrahma is referred as Rama. A human being should have this quality. A human being should be pleasing to others because of his qualities and he should give happiness to others with his qualities. One who causes grief to others and cannot be a source of solace is no human being at all. Hence Rama is a ‘nara’.Every ‘nara’ should be a Rama. To let us know that, when asked ‘who is that ‘nara’, Na:rada answered as ‘Rama’. Rama is famous all over the world because of his ‘gunas’.The thathva that can be known like light and air is only ‘brahmathathva’. There will be none who do not know or who do not enjoy this. But they neither attempt to behave so nor try to attain the same. To be concluded..... Jaisrimannarayana!!! Ramanujamma Mudumbai, Ramanujadasi _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Varadarajan Sourirajan: "Thirumaalai-33"
- Previous message: Rohit Iyer: "Re: Doubt on Brahma Shabdam!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]