Srimad Ramayana Tatthva Deepika - Ba:la Ka:nda (24)
From the Bhakti List Archives
Ramanujamma Mudumbai • Mon Jul 29 2002 - 23:13:42 PDT
Srimathe Ramanujayanamaha!!! Jeeyar Thiruvadigale saranam!!! The purpose of Na:radas visit to Va:lmikis ashram (hermitage) was to propagate SriRamayana in this world. As he knew that the para Bhagavan had come down to the earth as nara SriRama and established dharma and He was the only one who had all the above mentioned kalyana gunas that are enumerated in the Upanishads, Na:rada is answering Va:lmikis question glorifying the inherent Brahmathathvam and the peripheral Ramathathvam. He said, The gunas you mentioned may be counted as sixteen but there is a possibility that many more gunas are concealed in each guna. It is outside our capability to prove the scope of those gunas. They are unlimited. Its very difficult to find out. When Va:lmiki questioned as sixteen , Na:rada's reply as bahavaha (many), and when SriRama as a human being is there with all these qualities (gunas); his answer as durlabhaha shows that these gunas refer to the vedanthavedya-paramapurusha and Naradamaharshi was very much aware of it. One guna among them is a:nanda and even this single one cannot be described fully or its limits determined properly. Thaitthareeyo:panishad had started to determine the extent of the Lord's 'a:nanda'in A:nandavalli and left concluding, yatho:va:cho: nivarthanthe: apra:pya manasa: saha Bhagavans a:nanda can neither be expressed in words nor reached by manas(mind) . Hence Narada said durlabhaha. As he understood the hidden vein of Valmikis question he started telling about such para and nara SriRama. In Ikshwa:ku dynasty there is one famous person named Rama, praised universally by one and all. Ikshwa:ku was the eldest son of Vaivaswathamanuvu. He worshipped SreeHari for long .The Lord blessed him with the idol of SriRanganatha, the form produced by His sankalpa and in which He presented Himself. Since then the lord Ranganatha had been worshipped by them. Hence that vamsam was the most suited for His incarnation and that is the reason behind Naradas mentioning of Ikshwakuvamsa. The One who is the moolaka:rana for this universe was born in someones vamsa. This is His sousi:lyam. Valmiki referred this when he questioned, gunava:n kaha. Na:rada answered, Ikshwaku vamsa prabhavaha. The Lord is not known by a single name alone. The Almighty has thousand divine names. One who has innumerable names,has taken a single name,'Sri Rama. Vasishta maharshi meaningfully and perfectly named him Rama as he gives a:nanda to all ,with his gunas. . There are two vyuthpatthys ramayathi ithi ra:maha ramanthe: asmin ithi ra:maha The yogis always keep experiencing the sathya jna:na:nanda swaru:pa and the anantha the Parabrahma. So Rama means parabrahma. As He possesses a:nanda and gives others a:nanda parabrahma is referred as Rama. A human being should have this quality. A human being should be pleasing to others because of his qualities and he should give happiness to others with his qualities. One who causes grief to others and cannot be a source of solace is no human being at all. Hence Rama is a nara.Every nara should be a Rama. To let us know that, when asked who is that nara, Na:rada answered as Rama. Rama is famous all over the world because of his gunas.The thathva that can be known like light and air is only brahmathathva. There will be none who do not know or who do not enjoy this. But they neither attempt to behave so nor try to attain the same. To be concluded..... Jaisrimannarayana!!! Ramanujamma Mudumbai, Ramanujadasi _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Varadarajan Sourirajan: "Thirumaalai-33"
- Previous message: Rohit Iyer: "Re: Doubt on Brahma Shabdam!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]