Re: More on Svargam and Naragam
From the Bhakti List Archives
• July 9, 2002
SRIMATHE RAMANUJAYA NAMAHA. A note for whomever following these posts, THE ORIGINAL DISCUSSION ON THIS TOPIC WAS MAINLY AROUND HOW OR WHY THERE CAN BE ¡¦RESIDUAL KARMA¡¦. DOES NOT THE EXHAUSTION OF PUNYAM IN SVARGAM LEAD TO A CONDITION OF '¡¦ZERO BALANCE¡¦ OF KARMAS? These have been dealt with in earlier posts. In the process it became irresistable to ask the question whether a place called heaven or hell exists at all. It must also be said that for a perfect yogin, (BG) for a brahma-upaasakan, (Taii Upa-II ¡V9) for a prapannan, the ¡¥fear¡¦ or possibility of reaching these places do not arise. Now coming to Sri Lakshmi narasimhan¡¦s mail¡K Dear Sri Lakshmi Narasimhan, Glad to have received this mail from you. You said, > > My question is regarding the part "what punyam > A soul(athman) goes to svargam only if she(I call > the athman with > feminine gender as I had studied from few learned > people that only > the paramathman is the purusha(the MALE) and all > other ones are > FEMALE (though differentiated only by bodies)) has > punyams to her > credit. I.E only if she doesn't have papas or the > papas that she has > in credit has been nullified by an equal amount of > punyas and the > excess punyas lead to svargam. So, when they are in > svargam there > excess punyams are also gone and they are given a > re-birth in order > to be given an oppurtunity to get to know about the > lord. But whether > the athman does punya or papa in the re-birth is a > different story. My response to this is Nowhere it is said in the texts, according to my limited knowledge,that paapam can be nullified by an equal amount of punyam. These two are treated separately only. In the case of paapam, some pariharas and praayasciththams are recommended. Parashara smirithi which is said to be appllicable to this kaliyuga, (Manusmrithi for Krutha yuga) tells a number of pariharas and praayaschiththams to various kinds of paapam. Certain henious crimes have also been earmarked as 'gone' cases, where the dosham is said to be twice the measure of Brahmahaththi dosham, for which the person has to necessarily undergo the recurcussions in its entirity. No escape. (Kindly go through Sri Sadagopan¡¦s mail in response to my first mail on this issue in which he has brought out these views as being found in Vishnu Purana, written by Sri Parashara. I don¡¦t know for sure whether the Parashara smrithi I am refering here is part of Vishnu Purana. The book I am referring to is a translated version by Sri Desikachar, published by Sri Aadhi shakara bhagavad pada veda sabha, 1979 edition.) Why I say all this is that the results of paapam have to be endured and the same holds good for punyams also. According to BG 6 -41 & 42, even a 'yogabrahshtan' ( the one who has slipped from yogam) after enjoying the logam of Punyaathmas (svarg?) is born in a good family. The paapa-punya balance seems to be a mixed bag for a majority. Like rain after sunshine and vice versa. No one is a perfect Punyaathma and no one is a perfect paapaathma. In the case of paapams, the motives and circumstances are also taken into consideartion. Parashara smrithi vindicates this view, so also does the the dialogue between Bheeshma and Yudhishtra, after Bheeshma was hit in the war (Anushasana Parvam 13, Adhyaay 8, of Mahabharatha specifically addresses the question of purva janma karma and the interpretation of Dharma in that context). Coming to the core issue that is troubling us, the results of the punya karmam can be any of the following depending on the nature of the punya karmam. These, according to Taiittriya Upanishad, are 1.prajaya - good children 2. pashubhihi - riches like cattle, in todays context material comforts. 3.brahmavarchas - brahma tejas 4. annam - good food 5. svargena - svargam (Taii upa - I-3.4) The upanishad's recommendation for the punya karma to attain the above is the single minded upasana of 'mahasamhitha' of the 5-fold knowledge of and the requisite action with reference to Adhi lokam, Adhi Jyothisham, Adhi Vidhyam, Adhi Prajam and Adhyaathmam. The karma that are resposible for various kinds of results mentioned above are different from each other. For example, actions like digging well for the benefit of people, performing yagas as per the three vedas etc qualify the person to reach svargam, provided they are capable of giving perfect punyams, not hindered by that kind of paapam that will not qualify him to go to svargam. That is why once after the enjoyment of the punyam in svargam, the jiva comes back to earth with the ¡¥residual karma¡¦ But talking about paapa karma, the texts seem to say that those who have done paapa karma only and the most henious ones at that are born as trees, animals and birds. The kinds of experiences that the jiva is said to undergo in hell are all akin to what they experience on this world. The diseases, the accidents, natural calamities and man- made sufferings (who can forget the sufferings of different magnitude that must have come into fruition to different people on the day WTC was brought down?) The description of these sufferings tally with whatever you find in the explanation for hell. > Also, in mahabharatham, at the end of their era the > pandavas go to > heaven and before they go to heaven dharmaputra is > shown a glimpse of > what hell is just because he had attempted/helped to > lie(aswatthama > hatha kuncharaha). This is in Shri Vyasa's > mahabharatha which means > the swargam and naragam definitely exist outside the > karma bhoomi. > Isn't it? My point is not to scare anyone with the > concept of hell > and heaven, but if I can make them see the heaven > and the hell in the > right perspective that would be sufficient. Nobody > gets scared when > they are told they would be severely punished if > they violate some > law or say they will have life imprisonment in a > jail. Well, few > people get scared, but, the point is, most of them > make it a point > that they don't violate. That is all our religion is > trying to tell > isn't it? It doesn't try to scare them but tells > them that if they do > something wrong they deserve an equal punishment and > they could > escape this material world, but not in the spiritual „« world. I agree with you. I used to wonder that even the very purpose of advent (or invention?) of religions is to dictate some character and discipline in people¡¦s lives. But swearing on sv-precepts, we try to piece together the views from different sources to get a better perspective. (but land up in confused state as some people have predicted!!) „« „« I don't > know whether I am able to communicate what I want > to, but let me try > some example. If I do some mistake or say a typical > crime I could > always escape from being punished physically in this > material world > as all the typical laws have some loop-hole or > other, while, I can „« never escape from the hell is the point;-) Exactly. This is the level of understanding where I stand now. But I differ on the point of experience of the results of the crime in a separate abode called hell. Why I say so? I try to relate the real life experiences that I come across in palm reading (related with astrology and nadi- astrology which I have been doing, out of pure academic interest and to help people by guiding, directing and counselling them.) >From this experience of more than two decades, I am able to form certain notions based on repetition of occurrence and verification They are # for every action- however small it may be- done at the level of thought or action or speech, there is a proportionate and appropriate result accruing in the balance sheet. The crimes done in secrecy which may never be made known to the outside world are all being tackled in this hard and fast rule of cause and effect. Recall the BG sloka that the lord procliams himself as the Yama among those who control.(samya madam) He never uses the word among those who punishe etc. It is samya madam, because the results are inescapable (of course not for the prapannan etc. but where do we find one?) and are meted out with precision. # Only certain occurrences can be molified (as per certain indications in the palm) by praayaschiththam to minimise the effect of the result. # The so-called worst crimes ( I don¡¦t want to go into the details, for then I may be going against the self-imposed Hippocratic oath of this guidance I am doing) are MANIFESTETED as results IN THIS WORLD ONLY. We are able to trace a particular suffering to a particular crime and we get proof (through confessions and nadi- astrology readings) for them in many cases. In these cases the suffering must have been less, had some propitation taken place in HELL. But doesn¡¦t seem so- making me to conclude that no shedding of paapas had occurred at the transitory level.. Perhaps this level called 7 hells in BS might be to do with the state of existence with jivas of similar fate.(read my first mail on this topic) # In the absence of repentence, pariharas do not bear fruits. # the core idea behind suffering seems to be repentence, positive action to undo the kind of results that would have accrued due to the crime ( a chance is given to see how the affected party would have felt and by seeing or feeling this, repentence level is increased thereby reducing the prolongation of agony )and pro-active positive action. >These are >just my views > which I felt are different from yours. I am open for „« corrections for I too am open for correction I may be wrong or right ¡V partly But what is imporatnt is that we don¡¦t remain mute. We ask, search for answers and this probably will make us better people Will make us improve our awareness about so many things, Particularly about pain and sufferings And to sensitise ourselves to pain And grow in compassion , empathy and ahimsa. Perhaps it is for this we need to be treated with images of gories of hell and the sweetness of heaven!! Jayasree sarnathan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Lakshmi Narasimhan Venkatapathy: "Re: QUALITY of a srivaishnavan - Sri Visu's comments"
- Previous message: Krishnaswamy: "Swargam-Narakam"
- Maybe in reply to: jasn sn: "More on Svargam and Naragam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]