Re: QUALITY of a srivaishnavan - Sri Visu's comments
From the Bhakti List Archives
• July 8, 2002
--- In bhakti-list@y..., "lazy_nerd"wrote: > Srimathe Ramanujaaya Namaha: > I don't understand much of what has been said in this thread due to > my agyana(ignorance). But I would just like to add one thing. Azhwar > says - "NETRIYIL NINDRU ENNAI AALUM NIRAI MALARPPAADANGAL SOODI". > Just wearing the thiruman the lotus feet of emberuman is good enough > that will automatically lead to him perumal Please do not call > it as a pura-chinnam. I am a > 25 year youth who suffered a lot, for wearing THIRUMAN when I went to > school and college and I eventually stopped wearing it not being able > to tolerate the criticisms I had undergone. But am sure I will be > back to myself very soon wearing them and proudly announcing to > everyone that lord is right here with me by placing his lotus-feet on > my fore-heads. Dear sri lakshmi narasimhan, It is precisely due to problems such as these, I find many people not ready to wear or rather retain the Thiruman in the forehead when they go out. I have heard many people telling that they would rather go without thiruman than to be made to hear the 'nakkal' and 'kindal' that some one or the other takes graet relishment in flinging out. That, to them, seems to be a serious offence than whatever they are likely incur for not wearing the thiruman. In big cities or in temple towns one may not be coming across such experiences. But it is not so in many other places. But inspite of all this, we find many sv-s sporting sri choornam regularly. that much for their concern for the belief in their custom and let us appreciate them for that. I am sorry in case I had offended any one. I didn't > mean to. I just showered my feelings and also what I thought would be > a little value added contribution to this list. > Adiyen Ramanuja Dasan, > Lakshmi Narasimhan. > > --- In bhakti-list@y..., jasn sn wrote: > > SRIMATHE RAAMNUJAYA NAMAHA > > > > Many thanks to Sri Visu for making me think more on > > this subject. > > He says, > > > > > Even though Smt. Jayasree captions the quality as > > "desirable", she tends to > > > make it obrigatory > > > > This is about the purachinnangal. -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: jayasartn: "Re: More on Svargam and Naragam"
- Previous message: tatachar_at_aol.com: "Re: More on svargam and narakam"
- In reply to: lazy_nerd: "Re: QUALITY of a srivaishnavan - Sri Visu's comments"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]