Are there any Svargam and Naragam?
From the Bhakti List Archives
• July 2, 2002
SRIMATHE RAMANUJAYA NAMAHA Subject: Treatment of a Jeevathma after his encounters in Sorkam and Naragam Dear Bhagavatas, Adieyen has a basic doubt in the treatment of Jeevathma after his encounters in Sorgam and Naragam. As per my understanding, a jeevathma goes to Sorgam and enjoys the comforts there in direct proportion to the "Punniyams" in his credit. Similarly he suffers in Naragam which is also in direct proportion to the "Pavams" in his credit. Once this treatment is over, he has a zero balance of "punniams" and "pavams" and he becomes eligible for moksham, if he realises and practices the "Artha Panchakam". But my doubt is where comes the re-birth of jeevathama again in this "leela vibudhi" as he now has a zero balance of "Punniyams" and "Pavams" (They have been spent or compensated in Sorgam or Naragam Adiyen, Varadarajan Ramanuja Dasan. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DEAR SRI VARADARAJAN, I am also 'haunted' by this question and let me share what I know about this. But before that here is Sri Srikrishna Thathachar firing a salvo. Let's see.. In response to Sriman Varadarajan's question on svargam and narakam, my understanding is, this question does not araise for prapannAs. There is no svargam (heven), no narakam (hell), no punarjanmam (rebirth) and only mOxam(liberation). .. the elaborations, by whomsoever it may be, are only (secondary)details; some of those may serve some useful purpose, in guiding us to the source. They are only vehicles at best. However, most other elaborations are unnecessary and only shows the incredible ability of human mind to complicate things. ---------------------------------------------- DEAR SRI SRIKRISHNA THATHACHAR, I AM GOING TO DO JUST THAT ;) .. COMPLICATE THINGS FURTHER :-)) ------------------------------------------------ In one way or the other we all have that lawyer in us, sometimes more evident so than the Lord within us! -------------------------------------------------- DEAR SRI SRI.. NOT THE LAWYER BUT THE CHILD IN US WITH ALL THE CURIOSITY, EAGERNESS AND IMPATIENCE TO TALK..GIVEN THE SLIGHTEST OPPORTUNITY.. that is why i am here... to speak about this complicated topic, drawing courage from none other than my MENTOR, 'INBUTTRA SEELATHU ERAMANUSAN' Invoking his dedicatory opening verse in his sri bhashya to Vedanta Sutras, "May my understanding assume the form of loving devotion to that Highest Brahman who is the Home of Lakshmi, and to whom the creation, preservation, destruction &c.,of all the worlds is (mere) play, whose main resolve consists in the protection of hosts of multiform subordinate beings, and who is specially seen to shine forth in what constitutes the head of the Vedas" The question raised by Sri Varadarajan can be dealt at two levels. -> by finding out what happens to the soul (jiva) after leaving the body, ie., whether it goes to any places like svargam or naragam -> by finding out whether places called svargam and naragam do exist. To answer the first:- The consolidated version from different scriptures of yore has that there are 3 ways of passage for the beings after death. 1. Those who have done prapatti or Bhakti, go either through the path of the Sun or the Moon, or during the day or night or during the Northern or the southern course of the sun (the Uththarayana and Dhakshinayana) and reach the Brahman (brahma sutras chapter 4) They attain paramapada and there is no return for them. 2. The men of good conduct attain the world of gods and become Somaraja (king Soma)and on exhaustion of meritorious deeds are reborn with 'residual' karma. 3. The evil-doers after having undergone the results of their evil works in the abode of Yama (Brahma Sutras)are again reborn through the same course (lunar) (I requset the readers who have access to the book, Brahma Sutras, Sri Bhashya by Swami Vireswarananda and swami Adidevanada to go through the verse 3.1.7 and the explanation again and again. I think there is a hidden clue in this verse which I want to elaborate in the forth coming paragraphs) It is said that the one who has done good deeds like digging ponds for the benefit of people, performing yagas or giving gifts to the deserving, goes through the path of smoke and reaches the moon and becomes Soma raja (king Soma) It is also said that which goes by the path of smoke etc becomes the 'food' of gods (Chandogya)in this plane. But the soul is not a material edible thing. Does it make any sense to say that the soul which goes to this plane will be eaten by the gods there and simultaneously the soul is bound to enjoy the fruits of its good karma? Then what is that the text actually wants to say? The explanation goes that the word 'food' is not used in the primary sense but metaphorically, meaning objects of enjoyment and the soul in turn enjoys their (the soma gods') company! The next sutra goes to say that after being like this and after exhaustion of (good) work, (the soul) with the residual karma descends to the earth. These and other verses that follow raise these doubts: # How can there be any residual karma if the soul is said to have enjoyed it in the soma land? Does it mean that whatever karma that is residual now must be the bad karma? # Now that the residual karma is only the bad karma, why doesn't the soul go to the land of Yama and the seven hells as happens for those with bad karma? why does it descend to the earth straightaway? (Readers kindly note there is no reference to movement of souls from soma land to yama land or vive versa in core scriptures like BS. All descriptions about svarg and narag are found in later-born purans and stories. Any evidence to the contrary from the readers is most welcome) # The evil-doers after undergoing the fruits of their evil deeds are said to descend the earth and are born as the lowly beings, namely trees, animals etc. But according to BS verse 3.1.8, the good ones who have enjoyed the company of the gods of Soma come back to earth with the good residual karma and are born in good families, good places etc. How come they are now left with good residual karma, since they must have exhausted them all in the company of soma gods? # If it is to said that they have some balance of good karma to enable them to be born in good wombs, what is the yard stick to decide how much to be spent in the soma land and how much to be brought to the earth as residual karma? # The same types of questions arise in the case of evil-doers holed up in yama land. All these only go to show that there is something wrong somewhere in our understanding of the whole issue of souls reaching these levels and the so-called enjoyment of fruits of their bad and good karma after death. Taking cue from the hidden clue in the verse 3.1.7, shall we say that all that happens in the so-called soma world is that those souls reaching there (the transitory abode before preparing itself for the next birth)are fortunate enough to be in the company of other enlightened souls. Like how our guys and girls always want to make it to the IITs or AIIMS in India! Another way of looking at this is the repeated injunction from core scriptures that the souls are born again and again in this world to shed their karma. Then how can they be said to reap the results of the karma incurred in the earthly plane, at some other plane where they do not even exist in the physical form (made up of pancha bhoothas)? Another reasoning to support the above view is that the earth is said to be the Karma bhoomi (MahaBharatha). It is only in this plane that karma phalam can take place consummerate to the karma committed.The other worlds talked by our scriptures are (apart from Bhoo logam)Bhuvar, suvar, Maho, jano, Tapo and satya logam. Beyond these there is Vaikundam. One is at will to ask why can't the Bhuvar logam be the same as the Soma land or even svarga as most of us have been treated with stories of svarg-narag etc. The implications behind what actually is this Bhuvar or even Suvar logam are both philosophical and metaphysical or even might be to do with the levels of ascendence of the soul that scriptures like Taiitriya, Chandogaya and Brihadaranyaka speak about. The Taiittriya (let me take up this as i am somewhat- though very little- familiar with this Upanishad)speaks extensively about Bhoo, Bhuvar and Suvar levels. There are as many as 5 levels of explanations for these,(or for any philosophical matter that we find in scriptures. It all depends on our experience and our understanding to grasp the intricacies hidden in them.) For our discussion here, suffice it to concentrate on the following. Bhoo stands for Agni, Bhuvar stands for Vayu and Suvar stands for Adhitya tattwam. A correlation to this Taiitriya vachan is found in BS too in 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 The soul on departing from the body begins its journey from the light, (interpreted in the BS as agni) proceeds through vayu (Bhuvar?) and the reaches the Sun (Suvar) The subsequent verses in BS speak about the 'guide' souls who conduct the soils to their destinations. Nowhere do these passages indicte the existence of svarg and narag.A combined reading of the BS verse here and earlier on Soma land only indicates that the departed soul is not alone in its onward journey. There is someone to accompany it or guide it. If the Vayu level of Bhuvar is considered to be the transitory palne (because the soul is now prana devoid of a body), we have the liberty to assume that it is here it is spending its time with soma or yama in accordance with the kind of company it deserves. Beyond this the Sun (Suvar) comes, reaching which the soul marches towards paramapadam, because scriptures speak in unmistakable terms that those fortunate ones who reach the sun never come back!! Are there any other proofs to say that svarg or narag as we imagine do not exist, nor are our karmas spent at thses places? Difficult to say because even Nachiketas was prohibited from knowing the answer for this. But certain real-life occurences support the views mentioned above. One is the occasional cases we hear of (it must have happened in many of our families) persons just hours before dying,reportedly getting to see the pitrus or beloved ones who have left long ago. (Guides or like minded ones of the Soma land?) The other is about the numerous well documented cases of the clinically dead who have come back to life to tell what had happened in the near-death conditions. Their narratioins almost tally with the scenario explained above (about guides in accordance with their belief, say a christian getting to see angels to guide etc and going towards a light and so on) For further information in connection with the above views, I suggest a reading of R.K.Narayan's novel 'The English teacher'( a reflection of his real life experience after his wife died) and the books by the Buddhist monk, Lobsang Rampa, particularly, the book titled Twilight which also contains more of Visishtadwata views!! I request the devotees to have little more patience in reading this post because, I also want to say what Sri Ramanuja says in Vedanta sutras about svarg. >From the above discussion, we can infer that there are actually no such places called svarg or narag and the kind of good and bad attached to them. As I have come across some discussion on svarg (not narag)by Sri Ramanuja in Vedanta sutras, I think this post may not be complete without highlighting what Ramanuja says in his commentary on VS. In his Sri Bhashya to Vedanta Sutras, Ramanuja talks about Svargam in as many as 8 places.In all these places he treats the subject in the light of the Vedic injunction that, "he who desires to attain Svarga, shall perform Jyothishtoma sacrifice" and elsewhere he says that svarga is the world in which there is "no heat, no cold and no disagreeable-ness". (the relevant scriptures that speak about this sacrifice are Purva mimasaka and Taiittriya samhita) Prasna upanishad speaks of 16 kalas as those attainable by a man and this list ends with fruits of svarga. The high point of the discussion on this in SriBhashya to VS is Ramanuja's commentary in Adhikarana I sutra-1, 'Mimamsaka refuted' He finds the Vedic injunction 'JYOTHISHTOMENA SVARGAKAMA YAJETA" neither daily obligatory, nor occasionally obligatory. Because unlike the results of the knowledge of the Brahman, which are infinite and unenduring, the results of "these works (svarga kama sacrifice)" .."are temporal, bear fruit as soon as they are performed, in the form of plenty of food, healthiness and such other things which are enjoyed then (and there)and consequently there is no knowledge of the experience of that pleasure which in contra- distinction to them has no nature of (the working) of a commandment." Now placing together all the information we have seen above, some clarity seems to emerge (doesn't it?) -> Svarga as spoken in / meant by scriptures is different from what we, the small mortals understand, as posed by Sri Varadarajan. -> Svarga is a state of enjoyment which as Ramanuja says, seems to be very much in the wordly plane (The results of Jyothishtomena yagya) -> The abode to which the departed souls ascend may either be 'peopled' with souls of good nature and souls of bad nature. This is decided by the conduct of the soul while on the earth. This might be what is meant by enjoying the fruits of good or bad actions in svarg and narag. -> Going by Sri Ramanuja's description of svarg as a place where there is no dis-agreeable-ness, I get reminded of the many references picked up in Rampa's descriptions and after-death stories.There seems to be perfect harmony and serenity in the other side. This can either be called Pitru loka (BS speaks about this) or the much higher lokas of kinnara, yaksha etc. Even the Indra loka can be interpreted to mean the plane that one attains if he/ she has controlled indriyas in their life on earth. Because Indran means the one who has conquered the Indriyas. Taittriya upanishad minces no words in telling that one attains a particular level based on what one pursues (upasana). You believe there is svarg,(for the sake of arguement, for nowhere in Tai Upa I came came across a reference to svarg) with all its attendent happy things, you will come have happy things of svarg, so says tha Tai Upa. What you think, so you become. Probably that is why, later puranas and stories promoted notions about svarg and narag as means to promote good conduct in people. -> Enjoyment by indriyas is possible only in the human form, and only on the Bhoo lokam. -> The supreme place that is humanly possible is the paramapadam which the mukhtas attain. The next lower possible level is to reach the status of devas which include pitrus, siddhas, gandharvas, kinnaras, vasus and yakshas. This depends on the differnt levels of knowledge attained by the jivas. Once the time period to be in these levels gets over, and if the jiva continues to possess residual karma to be shed, rebirth takes place. The inferior categories are stated as those of animals and plants. It seems it is not only by our actions, but also by our attitude we choose where we have to be after death. The real experience of happiness and suffering, if they are to be synonymous with svarg and narag can take place on the earth only where such experiences can be felt through the indriyas and not in formless states! Quote 1. THE MIND IN ITS PLACE AND IN ITSELF CAN MAKE A HEAVEN OF HELL AND A HELL OF HEAVEN-- Milton Quote 2. IF THERE IS NO HELL, HOW CAN THERE BE ANY RELIGION? -- Anonymous. Quote 3. VEDANTA RECOGNISES NO SINS, IT ONLY RECOGNISES ERRORS AND THE GREATEST ERROR, SAYS THE VEDANTA, IS TO SAY THAT YOU ARE WEAK, THAT YOU ARE A SINNER, A MISERABLE CREATURE AND THAT YOU HAVE NO POWER AND YOU CAN NOT DO THIS OR THAT -----Swami Vivekanada. EdumE eniya swargaththil, ennam naragil ettu ChudumE avattrai taru thollai suzhal pirappil nadumE eni nam Ramanujan nammai nam vasaThE vidumE sharanam.... (Ramanuja Noottrandhadhi) jayasree sarnathan. [ svarga and naraka do indeed exist, according to all Vedantins including Ramanuja. Please see Brahma Sutra 3.1.15: "Moreover there are seven (hells)." /api ca saptaH/. The numbering of the sutra may differ from commentator to commentator. -- Moderator ] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Mani Varadarajan: "Basics of the three schools of Vedanta"
- Previous message: Tirumanjanam SundaraRajan: "Jayakhya Samhita."
- Next in thread: Sadagopan: "Re: Are there any Svargam and Naragam?"
- Maybe reply: Sadagopan: "Re: Are there any Svargam and Naragam?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]