Bhakti and sharanaakathi before Ramanuja
From the Bhakti List Archives
• June 29, 2002
Sri: Thirukkurhur sadagOpan vazhiye!! anbUlla thiru.ulaganAdan avarkale, adiyenin pranAmam. (Dear Members, first we should heartly welcome Thiru.UlaganAdan to this forum. Thiru.UlaganAdan's reputation has precceded him to this forum. He is consider a scholar of great calibre on the vast tamizh literary works) I have had the pleasure of exchanging scholarly posts with him in a forum elswhere on the WWW. I take pleasure in doing so again. It also gives me great encouragement to interact with a person of his calibre. I would be happy to provide the facts as seen by many other scholars researching/studying the field of bhakti before rAmAnusar. Dr.UlaganAdan wrote: > While granting all these I am not sure whether Bakti as total self > surrender to BEING is something these Vedanta texts mention or >elaborate. Bakti as saraNaakati, as self surrender belongs >essentially Tamil developments in spirituality and this is >something developed during 6th cent. A.D. against the desiccation >of genuine spirituality introduced by the positivistic Buddhists >who developed LOGIC at the expense of deep understanding of genuine >metaphysics. > Bakti arose along with Hymnology where the divine melodies >combined LOVE with spirituality and through that MELTED the heart >and through that spiritualized self. This was ABSENT during the >Upanisadic period and very clearly Ramanuja, in enthusiasm perhaps, >is READING into the Vedanta Texts what he has learned from the >Tamil Bakti poetry. This is an error in Vedanta exegetic -- reading >into them what is not there in fact. The Ghasundi inscription which is dated to 200 BCE (i request members to refrain using BC and AD. Please use BCE and CE instead). The Ghasundi inscription mentions the shrine of Shankarshana and Vaasudeva worshipped in a theistic form. This essentially means that a theistic form of devotion exsisted much before the advent of Adi Shankar or for that matter, the Alwars, Nayanmars and Ramanuja. Whether the Buddhists introduced 'positivistic' thinking is a topic beyond the scope of this forum. I will concentrate on what the environment in the periods before the advent of Gautama Buddha had to say about bhakti and sharanAgathi. Bhakti and sharanAgathi is deeply rooted in the vedAs. The rig vedam is replet with the concept of sharnAgathi. I quote from Dr.Sadagopan's mail: "The selected pramANams that have Vedic Roots on Bhaara NyAsam/Prapatthi/Aathma SamarpaNam/sharanAgathi/Bhakti et al thus commence from the ancient Rg Vedam and goes forward: Rg Vedam : X.4.4, I.189.1 , III.20.4, III.14.2, VI.29.3, VIII.92.32, X.133.6,X.4.1, X.63.10, VIII.45.20. SvEtasvatara Upanishad: 6.17, ChAndhOgyam : 2.23.3-4 ,2.23.1 MuNDakam: 2.2.4 , Bhagavath GithA : 7.14, 7.15, 18.62 NS 18.66, AzhwAr Paasurams as Tamizh Vedams et al." The concept of bhakti and sharanAgathi in the Tamizh Murai of the Alwars and Nayanmars do not differ from those seen in the Vedam and the Upanishads. This begs the question, if the concepts were rooted in the vedams, did they then serve as a source of inspiration for the Tamizh literary opi? One has to understand that no one is following a 'patent' my works fundamental here. The experiences of the inspired rishi and the great alwars and nayanmars are what we humans with our limited intellect fail to understand. Then again, we have marxist historians, christian missionary historians (that is a paradox within itself, one can't be a christian missionary while trying to be a scholarly historian) and so called secular historians who date the advent of the alwars and nayanmArs beyond their traditional dates. For example, the King James version of the bible was inspried by a Jewish commentary on the Torah, although christian missionaries vehemently reject this fact. This is a forum where the traditionally accepted history as evident in the vast ocean of tamizh and samskrutam works supersedes that of any other 'western' commentaries/explanations. The vedAnta is essentially eisegetic is nature, although elements of exegesis exsist from time to time. veDanta does not say one has to avoid societal values all together. The upanishads inspire the mumukshu (one who seeks to be librerate) and the bubukshu(one who seeks to lead a just life on earth) equally. This is why the emphasis is placed on dharma, artha, moksha and kama which are the four highly important purushArthas (goals for humans). This is clear that there was no polemic between the vast tamizh treasure of the alwars, ilAngo vadigal, nAyanmArs and the samskrutam treasures. Of course, both of benefitted from mutual cross fertilization. The works of the alwars and the nAyanmars enable the common man to understand the essence of the upanishads. The upanishad scholar deeply cherises the bhakti laden works of the alwars and nayanmArs. To sum it all up, the concept of bhakti and sharnAgathi are also found in the upanishads. The bhakti movement as we popularly know it arose as a criticism of the buddhist and jain ascetic way of life. The concepts of renouncing society out right without engaging it is found more in buddhist and jain works. Obviously the buddhistic and jain ideals was repugnant to the vast section of humanity who were overwhelmed by the bhakti movement. As thiruvalluvar would say, knowledge is always slippery. Knowledge is like sand in our closed fist, all of it escapes from our grip easily, we shold make constant efforts to learn all the time. Adiyen ramanuja dasan, Malolan Cadambi __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Group Home: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bhakti-list Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: Rengarajan Srinivasan: "New member introduction"
- Previous message: Visu9_at_aol.com: "Re: Countering criticism of Sripad Ramanuja's approach to Vedanta ..."
- Next in thread: Visu9_at_aol.com: "Re: Bhakti and sharanaakathi before Ramanuja"
- Maybe reply: Visu9_at_aol.com: "Re: Bhakti and sharanaakathi before Ramanuja"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]