himsa versus ahimsa
From the Bhakti List Archives
• July 6, 2001
I don't think it is that simple mani. As you correctly pointed out I did omit the act that is neither selfless nor selfish; however, for acts motivated by selflessness, selfishness, or a combination of both (which would also be denoted selfish) the standard outlined in the post is applicable. In the case of the cold-blooded killer the act is selfish. The reasoning is as follows. The act is obviously not selfless as it is not for the broader public benefit. Nor is it inadvertent. Thus, it must be selfish. Ultimately however, only the individual committing the act and the ordainer know of the true nature of the motivation. I will try to outline the standard in greater detail over the weekend (including looking at the relationship between the standard and the principle of dharma.) ramanuja dasan, Venkat -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@yahoogroups.com Archives: http://ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/archives/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Next message: vijayan ramasamy: "Re. A Small Requirement on behalf of Sri.M.A.Venkatakrishnan Swami"
- Previous message: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: Vaikanasa srivaishnava"
- Next in thread: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: himsa versus ahimsa"
- Maybe reply: Mani Varadarajan: "Re: himsa versus ahimsa"
- Reply: Malolan Cadambi: "Re: himsa versus ahimsa"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]