Some thoughts on recent discussions in the list.
From the Bhakti List Archives
• July 29, 2000
Dear Fellow SrI vaishNava-s: Some of you may know that I have been a member of the bhakti list for some time now. I have observed that, like the cycle of creation and praLaya, we keep getting into the mode of "fighting it out in the public", to establish that one view point is better than the other. It is unfortunate that two such controversies are being exchanged simultaneously in the list at this time. One started with suggestions for some improvements in the administration of fund-raising efforts, and the other started with the usefulness and efficacy of nAdopAsana in attaining spiritual liberation. My intent is not to add my view on the original issues themselves and contribute to the controversy further. My intent of this note is that respected members of the list should try not to let the discussion go to a level where they become controversies in public. This does not contribute to the harmony which is a core of devotion to perumAL in my opinion (I can't quote any scriptures for this, and hope I am not far off from the scriptures). I would like to strongly request that the discussion be moved to the private domain as soon as either party senses that a "opiniated controversy" is developing. This should be simple enough to do. Long back I had suggested that one way to avoid these kinds of open discussions which are disruptive, is to read your mail a couple of times to see what can be re-worded in order to avoid taking positions which establish the superiority of your views over the other views in words that will offend the other party. The basic spirit that is missing is that some of us do not want to tolerate any opinion other than what he/she holds dear to. There is a Sloka attributed to SrI yAmunAcArya that I have been wanting to share with the group for a long time. Here it is: "hanta! brahmopadeSoyam SraddddhAneshu Sobhate | vayam aSraddadhAnAh smo ye yuktim prAthayAmahe || "Well, all this dogmatic teaching may carry conviction with (blind) believers; we are lacking in such faith and we search for logical reasons to convince us". I understand that this was how the great AcArya approached issues. We can learn to question, and to be questioned, in the spirit of the above. We can learn to tolerate alternate views without being offended at the first mention of an alternate view from another individual, especially when these members in our list are all well-intentioned individuals. We do not need to attribute "bhagavad apacAram, bhAgavata apacAram, sarva apacAram and samasta apacAram", the moment somone questions anything we believe in. And if we do want to interpret any alternate opinion as apacAram of one kind or another, we can move the discussion to the private domain by one of the parties initiating such a move so that the ripple effect of disruption does not permeate the spirit of the list periodically. I had also proposed long back that there should probably be an editorial board for the list (I had suggested SrI Mani as the sole member for this task, even though it will demand more of his time), which will go through the postings and minimize controversies of a disruptive nature. This was voted out earlier by the respected members. I will propose this once more for the members' consideration. Just some thoughts which I think can be useful in developing our spiritual knowledge collectively and serving emperumAn in some small way. -dAsan kRshNamAcAryan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. http://invites.yahoo.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------http://click.egroups.com/1/4634/5/_/716111/_/964911669/ --------------------------------------------------------------------|e>- -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information
- Next message: Sadagopan: "GodhA Sthuthi: Part X -SlOkam 7"
- Previous message: Lakshmi Srinivas: "Fwd: Re: Reg. funding Srivaishnava causes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]