Re: addr: M. S. Hari
From the Bhakti List Archives
• July 28, 2000
dear BhAgavathAs, adiyEn has been watching Sri M S Hari's comments (some of them quite uncalled for)on the original posting on Kuzhalosai, his questioning and doubting the efficacy and authenticity of nAdOpAsanA as a means towards prapatti and adiyEn was wondering why nobody is taking up the issue strongly for nAdOpAsanA except one or two postings. Sri Sheshadri's posting finally made me join the issue. there can be absolutely no doubt that nAdOpAsanA is one of the easiest and surest means to lead one towards prapatti. only a person who has not experienced it can have doubts on this. adiyEn can quote extensively from sadguru tyagaraja's compositions like sangeeta gnAnamu, mOkshamu galadA, shobillu shabtaswara etc. to support this viewpoint. but adiyEn is afraid that the response may be something on the lines that tyAgarajA was born as an advaiti and what does he know about srivaishnavism, or where is it stated in the srutis. well, saint tyagarajA, UthukkAdu venkatasubbier and the likes were born in advaiti families, but they were as much srivaishnavites as anyone of us can ever be. casting aspersions on their nAdOpAsanA is blasphemy to my mind. it is something even sriman nArAyaNA will not forgive and certainly tantamounts to bhAgavatha apachAram of the highest order. if somebody were to say that nAdOpAsanA will not lead to prapatti, adiyEn does not want that kind of prapatti. if someone were to say that tyAgarAjA or UthukkAdu or purandaradAsA's nAdOpAsanA will not lead to mOkshA, adiyEn does not aspire that kind of mOkshA. everytime we who believe in nAdOpasanA hear a kriti like 'entharO mahAnubhAvulu anthariki vandanamulu' or 'enna thavam seythanai yasodA' (both composed by advaitis, by the way!) or 'krishnA nee beganE bArO', tears fill up our eyes. (my eyes are moist as adiyEn types this). if this kind of nAdOpasanA is not Bhakti then what is? adiyEn is not a scholar like sri hari. but adiyEn knows one thing certainly. Our Bhagavan has clearly stated in His Gita that those who have acquired theoretical knowledge of the shAstrAs and vedAs etc. are not necessarily dear to Me. That person is dear to Me who has placed his mind on Me. adiyEn is very clear that nAdOpAsanA within seconds places my mind, body and soul at His lotus feet. this to my immature mind is the most practical way of seeking refuge at His feet , even if a thousand Haris were to tell me that it is not sanctioned by the scriptures. may the learned bhAgavathAs pardon adiyEn for any erroneous thought! adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan narasimhan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. http://invites.yahoo.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------http://click.egroups.com/1/6630/5/_/716111/_/964850589/ --------------------------------------------------------------------|e>- -------------------------------------------------------------- - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH - To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list@eGroups.com Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information
- Next message: M.S.HARI (Madabhushi Sarangarajan Hari): "Re: [addr: M. S. Hari]"
- Previous message: Sadagopan: "GodhA Sthuthi: Part IX: SlOkam 6"
- Maybe in reply to: Sheshadri Ranganathan: "addr: M. S. Hari"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]