Apology for my mistake
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 6, 1999
Dear Bhagavatas, In my previous note on "why have kalais", i made a mistake in wrongly interpreting the follow: .... Little do we realize that when we start our Thiruvaradhanam, we start as "Ramanuja Dhaya Patram", and not with what kalai we belong to. If we truly consider Ramanuja as our Paramacharya (and i am sure all of us do), why are we restricted to following only one kalai.... As I came to understand later from one of the fellow bhagavathas, "Ramanuja Dhaya patram" is the Vadakalai version, and does not pertain to both kalais. I apologize for my lack of knowledge and jumping to conclusion. Maybe I should have used a better example by way of the Moolamantrams, which are devoid of kalais and pertain to only Perumal. I sincerely thank this fellow bhagavatha for setting me right. adiyen, ramanuja dasan (srinivasan)
- Next message: Kalyani Krishnamachari: "More feedback on NT 5.5 - poru kayal kaN"
- Previous message: vasan_at_lexmark.com: "Why Have Kalais"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]