Ladies and ThirumaNN kAppu
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 26, 1998
Dear Sri Srinivasan : " Pazhaya Kaalatthu AmmAmis " ( Ladies of earlier generations) used to wear Sri chUrNam on their foreheads and then add the kumkumam at the lower end of it , just above the brows. This was their normal "dress code " . Later , it ended up in pottu . Even today , during formal occasions ( Marriage et al ) in Sri Vaishnavite homes , Sumangalis wear the red Sri ChUrNam and the Kumkumum on their foreheads . One step further , the ladies , who lost their husbands wore a white crescent just above the brows from ThirumaNN instead of the whole U-shaped form and wore yellow dot above . Blank forehead was rarely seen among widows in the earlier days especailly in villages . While on this subject , a reference was made to Ladies reciting Sahasra Naamam and attracting the attention of Men by accident because of their sweet tones and higher pitch . The deeply rooted cultural mores of India in Sri Vaishnavite homes rarely would lend themselves to men and women sitting in the same ghOshti and reciting Sahasra Naamam or any other sacred works together . My mother and grand mother wont even sit in front of their husbands even at home . Even in this country , the ladies and women sit in separate groups at the temple following the Indian traditions . They may recite the sacred works , but from different sections of the assembly . The old generation couple in India rarely ate together . The husband and children were fed first before they could eat . Many of our women in the cities of India are C. As , Doctors, Lawyers et al today and these customs under time pressures have changed . The restrictions on women reciting scriptures are common also in Muslim and Jewish religions . In both these religions, women are relegated to separate seats away from the Orchestra level seating . The old Roman Catholic religion has ongoing fights about accepting women into preisthood and who can say the mass . All aside , I do not see any reason for the ladies reciting Sahasra Naamams at home in front of pujA graham daily . My grand mothers on both sides had Vedic Scholars as husbands . They were however illiterate and could only make thumb impressions as signatures on official documents . Both however had good grasp of slOkams and they recited them and left the menfolk to teach it to us . They learned it as chilldren from their fathers and recitesd them as they went about their chores . In Swami Desikan's times , the ladies were pampered and they were not subject to the rigors of speaking in Sanskrit , even if they could . They elected instead to speak in PrAkrutham . That had the sweetness and the endearing "lisp " . In the Vedic times , the wives of many Sages were profound Vedic Scholars and debated with their husbands on esoteric subjects in deva bhAshA . Whole Upanishad has resulted from such a discussion between sage Yaj~nyavalkya and his consort . The Rishis for some of the Veda manthrAs are women . They are the manthra dhrushtAs . Times have indeed changed ! V.Sadagopan V.Sadagopan
- Next message: Parthasarati Dileepan: "What is service?"
- Previous message: Ramaswami Vasudevan: "Divya Prabhandham"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]