On Sanskrit vs. tamil
From the Bhakti List Archives
• January 3, 1998
Dear members, To continue on the use of Tamil on par with Sanskrit, I would like to quote the following from Srivaishnava ManipravAlA by Sr. K. K. A. Venkatachari. ------------------- Nanjiyar's Defence of Tamil: As the idea of Tamil Veda increased in popularity and the hyms of the Alvars became known beyond Tamil Nadu, there were criticisms raised against the claims that the 4000 was the Tamil Veda and that Tamil could be considered on a par with Sanskrit as a language of religious texts. Such objections include: a. That tamil is a forbidden language. b. That even the lower classes read the scriptures and hyms written in tamil and so pollute them. c. That some of the religious hyms were written by NammAlvAr a vaishnava saint born in the fourth varna, considered to be of low standing. d. Tamil is a regional language and not understood throughout the country as sanskrit. e. that even avaidhikas such as jains and buddhists adopt this language to expound their preaching, (manimekhalai, etc). f. That the vaishnava hymms and writings do not elaborate on all four objects (dharma, artha, kAma and moksha) needed for a full life, but concentrate only on kAma and moksha. g. That the hymms contain a number of references to nAyakanAyakibhAva, where God is considered as Nayaka and the soul Nayaki and thus prostitutes such holy hymms to bare erotic feelings. Nanjiyar in his onpathinAyirappati (9000) effectively refutes these charges and argues for the greatness of Tamil. a. It is nonessential to contend that Tamil is a forbidden language, as any language is appropriate for praising God. He quotes from matsayapurAna the story wherein a king orders that kaisika, one of the devotees was singing the praises of the Lord in a language other than Sanskrit, to be banished from his kingdom. Yamma, the Lord of death tells the King that his attitude is wrong and that any language is appropriate for praising God. b. Scriptures do not become polluted by the lower classes reading them, on the other hand, this is a boost for God's apostolic work, since propagation of religion through such means is necessary for the good of the world. c. That a person born in a lower varna is no fault of his. What makes him worthy and venerated is his erudition and moral rectitude. Nanjiyar says, he (NammAlvAr) had such a learning and was so pious and venerable that even God Himself desired NammAlvAr's vast store of knowledge and wisdom. d. Tamil may be a regional language, but it is understood by all men of real learning in other languages in other regions of India. Such learned men who do not know Tamil actually regret that they do not have the good fortune to know it. e. That even the Avaidhkas used Tamil as the medium of their preachings is actually a credit to the Tamil language. f. That the hymms of alvArs do not elaborate all the four objects cannot be considered a discredit to the hymms of teh AlvArs , since their intention is only to guide the people towards the attainment of eternal salvation and they do not consider the other elements necessary for a full life. g. The view that nAyakanAyakibhAva gives the Alvar's hymms a taint of eroticism and thus makes them inferior is not correct. for the nAyakanAyakibhAva should be interpreted as signifying the spiritual union of soul and God and not erotic lovers. The nAyakanAyakibhAva is only a stage of devotion which helps the ordinary mortal to understand and appreciate the concept of devotion to God. Nanjiyar's defense of the use of Tamil explicitly makes scriptural knowledge available to all varnas. This view is opposed to the earlier view of the Bhraminic orthodoxy which states that only twice born may know the vedas or Upanishads. Therefore, knowledge of the scriptures becomes no longer an opportunity defined by brth, but rather one defined by participation in the Srivaishnava community. --------------------- I'll follow up with Sir PeriyavAccAnpillai's defence of Tamil, which appears to be stronger than that of Nanjiyar's defence. AchAryarkaL ThiruvadigalE SaraNam Venkatesh
- Next message: muralidhar rangaswamy: "Re: Sanskrit vs Tamil"
- Previous message: Shree: "fwd: The Supreme Being is impartial"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]