language and spiritualism
From the Bhakti List Archives
Chandrasekaran. V • Fri Jan 02 1998 - 06:06:51 PST
Dear Bhagavadhotamas,
I have a few thoughts about the recent discussions about
'comparison between sanskrit and tamil' which I would like to
share with the members. I request Bhagavadhotamas to pardon me
if I am wrong or diverting anywhere.
o The Lord stands transcending all barriers and discriminations
with His immeasurable mercy for whoever sheds his mortal bondages
and realises whole-heartedly that his inner Atman is nothing but
the manifestation of the ParamAthman, the Lord Himself and merges
in union with the Supreme Purusha. The Lord doesn't care what method
his devotee is employing in realising Him.
o If we realise the Lord's divine nature and then come to analyse
our mundane activities, we can only feel guilty at the way we are
attaching significance to them. These mundane activities include
all our customs, traditions, language etc.,
o There is no language that can express a Bhakta's feeling when he
is in union with His Lord. At this point any language will fail
pitifully to express the transcending feelings that emanate from
the innermost heart of the realised Bhakta.
o A language is only a "upakaranam" to attain the Lord's feet. It
would be a waste of time and intellect to attach even a wee bit of
importance to these 'instruments' in our journey toward the Supreme
Lord.
o Did not the epitome of Spiritual wisdom, Lord Dhakshinamurthi
himself remain blissfully silent and still pass his Supreme knowledge
to his divine disciples viz., sanaka, sanandhana, sanathsujAtha? This
more than assures us that language is only redundant to realise the
Para Brahmam. [ But for us mortals, the divinely merciful sages had to
put the knowledge in words in order to be better propagated and
understood ].
o Language is basically a worldly knowledge and is not to be counted
as anything spiritual though it is used for conveying our feelings
partially. When the Supremely pure Azhwars praise the glories of the
Lord, it is only for the Lord and not for making tamil flourish as a
better medium. And Saint Thyagaraja, if he had composed thousands of
songs in praise of His Lord, it is only for the Lord and not to show
his fluency in his mother tongue. So when a Bhakta is using this instrument
namely language to praise His Lord, it is only to try to reach the Lord's
Heart through some mortal means, but, which never counts for him.
o There is an interesting anecdote from Sri Adi Sankharacharya's
sojourn in kAsi.
- He finds a very old man on the banks of Ganges where the
man is reading very vigorously something as though he were
doing that for some serious cause. The old man, Sankhara
discovers, is reading "Pannini's Sanskrit Grammar". Sankhara
couldn't resist his pity for this old man who is wasting his
precious life in learning something which is not going to lead
him to his ultimate goal. He composes his philosophical "Bhaja
Govindham" at that instant to record a lesson for the worldly
souls who are attaching undue importance to the mundane knowledge
and advises,
"O ignorant mind! Chant the name of the Lord...
That alone can save you from this samsAra sAghara...
All the remaining worldly talks and knowledge will
never show any light during your journey towards the
Supreme goal"
adiyArkku adiyEn,
-chandrasekaran.
- Next message: Shree: "fwd: The Supreme Being is impartial"
- Previous message: Shree: "raama mantra - maraaThii - 6-10"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
